Author: Chessfun
Date: 12:15:08 10/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2000 at 14:38:51, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >Please pay _careful_ attention: Tiger beta testing has been going on for >some while. The word "beta" was intentionally used. As I also said later, >I was unaware that "tiger beta" and "gambit tiger beta" were two different >things. My statement is _still_ 100% correct. Your understanding of it is >lacking, however. > >Would you like a precise count of the number of games vs tiger beta that Crafty >has played on chess.net, fics, and ICC? As will be apparent further down. Your understanding of Tiger Beta compared to Tiger is wrong. Making your "hundereds of games" statement false. >That shows your ignorance. Ask any of the following players if they have >been noplayed, and how many games they have played against Crafty over the past >week: > >KyFats: 35 >BountyHunter: 26 >CChess: 52 >KillerMachine: 7 Then I assume you will read the following and confirm your own ignorance? KYFATS 1: ChessPartner 4.3/ChessTiger 12.0e(modified) NOT TIGER BETA Cchess Is only at Chessnet and FICS. BountyHunter 1: Programs are Genius 6.5, Shredder 4, and RebelTiger. NOTE. This is _NOT_ a beta program. KillerMachine 3: Chess Program Currently Running: ChessTiger 12.0 (Rebel-Tiger) NOT TIGER BETA One out of Four....hmmmm >Those were played in the last 2 weeks. Others are using tiger as well but >they have disabled the kibitz, and I don't feel like taking the time to >track them down. Does the above add up to over a hundred? Without really >trying? So would you like to re-think your statement and perhaps retract >it since it is easy to shoot it down as wrong? Does the above one account cchess add up to not over a "HUNDRED" but the word used "HUNREDS" So would you like to re-think your statement and perhaps retract it since it is easy to shoot it down as wrong? >I picked 4 tiger players that stuck out. There are others. I believe that >Albert is testing as well. So yes, I have seen _hundreds_ of games. Albert may be playing now you removed him from your no play list. But _NO_ you have not seen "hundreds of games". >If they can't get within 200 points, that is _my_ problem? The ones that are >rated as high or higher do _not_ play Crafty of their own choosing. Wonder why >that is? Maybe Intel SC450NX quad xeon/550mhz, 512mb RAM, 5X9 10K LVDS disks, would have something to do with it. But seriously the high rated acounts would play you if they weren't concerned about getting noplayed as a result of your notes. And from what I see most do play you whenever they get the chance. But pray tell....Why do you think they don't play Crafty?. >>Crafty has that rating because of it's processor and it's restrictive >>policy. If it was open to play computers within 400 that rating would >>fall significantly. And since as pointed out above it isn't actually >>playing very often the only logic to it is rating protection. > >Consider your psychic abilities on a par with the rest of your comments. > >IE worthless. Thanks for sharing another Hyattism. Sarah.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.