Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 12:23:43 10/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2000 at 14:54:48, Peter Berger wrote: >>Whose talking about Tiger operators....again...we are talking Tiger Beta's. >>I talk to those operators daily.....Fact...you have not played "hundreds" >>of games v any Tiger beta's. Fact...you added them to your noplay list. >> > >Hi Sarah , > >I snipped a lot . > >It seems most obvious you are right , but why fight it out ? > >When we leave out Mr Mecking for a second ( where my impression is Dr Hyatt >hasn't taken too much time reading what you have said ) it ends up to his ICC or >FICS or whatsoever accounts open or not open to play . > >It also is obvious he doesn't care too much if it is Tiger II beta or Tiger in >his arguments :-) Actually you are right. I haven't noticed any great difference in the two, after a _bunch_ of games played. As I mentioned, the main thing I have seen in the beta versions is a bit better endgame play. An IM and I watched the previous version make some really amusing endgame mistakes. The new version seems more aware of endgame ideas, which is good. As far as adding any tiger betas to my noplay list, I simply say "nonsense" to that. If they get on my noplay list, it _only_ for violating my finger notes about more than 4 games. If they can't read, that is not _my_ problem. The ones that follow my notes play all the time. And a few that don't get noplayed. > >Who cares ? > >Everyone can play who he wants . And I don't think you can win this argument :-) > >You can just fill the message board a little more and get a headache . > >Greetings. > >pete
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.