Author: Chessfun
Date: 12:30:18 10/05/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2000 at 14:54:48, Peter Berger wrote: >>Whose talking about Tiger operators....again...we are talking Tiger Beta's. >>I talk to those operators daily.....Fact...you have not played "hundreds" >>of games v any Tiger beta's. Fact...you added them to your noplay list. >> > >Hi Sarah , > >I snipped a lot . > >It seems most obvious you are right , but why fight it out ? Because I'm not often right LOL so I have to emphasize it when I am :-) Also it is funny !!! to actually try and get him to admit a point. >When we leave out Mr Mecking for a second ( where my impression is Dr Hyatt >hasn't taken too much time reading what you have said ) it ends up to his ICC or >FICS or whatsoever accounts open or not open to play . It's obvious he hasn't read what's been said...that's why it's so funny !! >It also is obvious he doesn't care too much if it is Tiger II beta or Tiger in >his arguments :-) It isn't the caring, it's in his lack of facts. >Who cares ? > >Everyone can play who he wants . And I don't think you can win this argument :-) >You can just fill the message board a little more and get a headache . No....I have had enough of this thread....I just wanted to see if at any point he would actually reply to what was said and at some point acknowledge he is wrong. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.