Author: Peter Davison
Date: 05:29:41 10/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2000 at 08:01:15, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On October 06, 2000 at 07:55:04, Mogens Larsen wrote: > >>On October 06, 2000 at 07:47:14, Peter Davison wrote: >> >>> >>> >>>In the extensive thread: "Once again Dr. Hyatt is right on--He is a >>>dispassionate observer", Bob Hyatt is asked: >>> >>>> >>>>Then why bother replying since you make it clear you are not interested >>>>in anything other than _insults_ when anyone questions anything. >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>>Bob Hyatt replies in the relevent thread: >>> >>>"Again, back up to the beginning. I didn't insult _anybody_." >>> >>>"This shows your ignorance." >>> >>>"Please don't make statements where you know exactly _nothing_ about the topic >>>you are talking about." >>> >>>"Consider your psychic abilities on a par with the rest of your comments. IE >>>worthless." >>> >>>"thanks for sharing nothing new..." >>> >>>"Then do you get a kick out of posting "ho hum" non-news?" >>> >>> >>> >>>In Bob's Forum, can Bob do whatever he wants? > >Apparently, he can or is it one of the perks of the moderator assignment? I >wonder why comments like these are more acceptable than the Shredder incident. >Maybe it's just too complicated to comprehend for someone like me. > >Mogens. Likely you understand the same as everyone else. Nobody dares do anything about the ways of Bob. They just leave the group. This stuff has been going on since 1995 and before. Always debate / arguments. Always Bob heavily involved. Always he uses the same style. Always he remains and the others leave, or just restrain their posts to inconsequentials. You lost a lot of good people in this way. Last one left standing. He always said it would be him.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.