Author: Eugene Nalimov
Date: 07:34:32 10/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
You can also submit some phrases of the other sides in the discussion -- and please understand that the accusions in the lie and falsification of the results are the worst you can say to the academitian. Eugene On October 06, 2000 at 07:47:14, Peter Davison wrote: > > >In the extensive thread: "Once again Dr. Hyatt is right on--He is a >dispassionate observer", Bob Hyatt is asked: > >> >>Then why bother replying since you make it clear you are not interested >>in anything other than _insults_ when anyone questions anything. >> >>Sarah. > >Bob Hyatt replies in the relevent thread: > >"Again, back up to the beginning. I didn't insult _anybody_." > >"This shows your ignorance." > >"Please don't make statements where you know exactly _nothing_ about the topic >you are talking about." > >"Consider your psychic abilities on a par with the rest of your comments. IE >worthless." > >"thanks for sharing nothing new..." > >"Then do you get a kick out of posting "ho hum" non-news?" > > > >In Bob's Forum, can Bob do whatever he wants?
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.