Author: Jason Williamson
Date: 09:41:03 10/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2000 at 22:48:40, Steffen Jakob wrote: >Hi! > >Here comes a position from a game Hossa - Arasan: > >[D]r3r1k1/3q2p1/2p1ppQP/2P3p1/1p1P4/pPb1RN2/P4P2/1K5R w > >There are two moves which are winning fast: Ne5 and Nxg5 (e.g. 1.Nxg5 fxg5 2. >Reh3 +-). Hossa missed those moves and lost the game. First I thought that this >should be very easy to find for a comp but after having talked to some >programmers I saw that other programs also need more time than I expected (at >least too long for a blitz game). How long does your favourite program take to >see either Ne5 or Nxg5 with a +- score (something like +0.5 doesnt count)? > >Greetings, >Steffen. New position r3r1k1/3q2p1/2p1ppQP/2P3p1/1p1P4/pPb1RN2/P4P2/1K5R w - - 0 1 Analysis by Fritz 6: 1.Re4 Rad8 ± (1.38) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 1.Re4 Rad8 ± (1.38) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 1.Re4 Rad8 ± (1.38) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 1.Re4 Rad8 ± (1.38) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 1.Re4 Rad8 ± (1.38) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 1.Re4 Rad8 ± (1.38) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 1.Re4 Rad8 ± (1.38) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 1.Re4 Rad8 ± (1.38) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 1.Re4 Rad8 ± (1.38) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 1.Re4 Rad8 ± (1.38) Depth: 2/3 00:00:00 1.Re4 Rad8 ± (1.38) Depth: 3/12 00:00:00 1.Re4-- ± (1.06) Depth: 4/16 00:00:00 1kN 1.Re4 e5 2.Rd1 Rad8 ² (0.63) Depth: 4/16 00:00:00 2kN 1.Re2! ² (0.69) Depth: 4/16 00:00:00 2kN 1.Re2! Rad8 2.Rh5 Rf8 ± (1.38) Depth: 4/19 00:00:01 2kN 1.Re2 Rad8 2.Re4 Qc7 3.Rg4 +- (1.41) Depth: 5/20 00:00:06 13kN 1.Re2-- ± (1.09) Depth: 6/22 00:00:10 62kN 1.Re2 Re7 2.hxg7 Rxg7 3.Qxf6 Qf7 4.Qxe6 ± (1.06) Depth: 6/22 00:00:10 65kN 1.Kc1! ± (1.09) Depth: 6/22 00:00:10 81kN 1.Kc1 Rad8 2.Re4 e5 3.h7+ Kh8 4.dxe5 Bb2+ 5.Kb1 Bxe5 ± (1.16) Depth: 6/22 00:00:10 99kN 1.Kc2! ± (1.19) Depth: 6/22 00:00:11 123kN 1.Kc2 Rad8 2.Re2 Re7 3.hxg7 Rxg7 4.Qxf6 g4 ± (1.09) Depth: 7/23 00:00:11 285kN 1.Kc1 ± (1.13) Depth: 7/23 00:00:11 334kN 1.Kc1 Rad8 2.Re2 e5 3.dxe5 Bxe5 4.Kc2 g4 5.Nxe5 Rxe5 ± (1.16) Depth: 8/26 00:00:13 911kN 1.Kc1 Re7 2.hxg7 Rxg7 3.Qxf6 Bb2+ 4.Kc2 Qf7 5.Qxe6 Qxe6 ± (1.03) Depth: 9/27 00:00:16 1820kN 1.Re2 ± (1.06) Depth: 9/27 00:00:17 2127kN 1.Re2 Re7 2.hxg7 Rxg7 3.Qxf6 Qf7 4.Qxf7+ Rxf7 5.Nxg5 Rd7 ± (1.16) Depth: 9/29 00:00:18 2234kN 1.Re2-- ± (0.84) Depth: 10/30 00:00:25 4498kN 1.Re2 ± (0.84) Depth: 10/30 00:00:25 4574kN 1.Rd3 ± (0.88) Depth: 10/30 00:00:29 5918kN 1.Rh5 ± (0.91) Depth: 10/34 00:00:35 7627kN 1.Rh5 Re7 2.hxg7 Rxg7 3.Qh6 Bxd4 4.Rd3 Rh7 5.Qxh7+ Qxh7 ± (1.06) Depth: 10/34 00:00:51 12571kN 1.Ne5 ± (1.09) Depth: 10/34 00:00:53 13176kN 1.Ne5 fxe5 2.Reh3 g4 3.Rh5 Bd2 4.hxg7 Bh6 5.Rxh6 Qxg7 +- (1.81) Depth: 10/34 00:00:54 13400kN 1.Nxg5 +- (1.84) Depth: 10/34 00:00:56 14352kN 1.Nxg5 fxg5 2.Reh3 g4 3.Rh5 Bd2 4.hxg7 Bh6 5.Rxh6 Qxg7 +- (2.34) Depth: 10/34 00:00:58 14745kN 1.Nxg5! +- (2.66) Depth: 11/28 00:01:04 16763kN 1.Nxg5! fxg5 2.Reh3 g4 3.Rh5 Kf8 4.h7 Ke7 5.Qxg7+ Kd8 +- (4.75) Depth: 11/33 00:01:09 18137kN 1.Ne5! +- (4.78) Depth: 11/33 00:01:10 18588kN 1.Ne5 fxe5 2.Reh3 g4 3.Rh4 Kf8 4.h7 Ke7 5.Rxg4 Rg8 +- (5.16) Depth: 11/33 00:01:10 18821kN 1.Ne5! +- (5.47) Depth: 12/28 00:01:15 20302kN 1.Ne5 fxe5 2.Reh3 g4 3.Rh4 Kf8 4.h7 Ke7 5.Qg5+ Kf7 +- (5.59) Depth: 12/31 00:01:17 21048kN 1.Ne5! +- (5.91) Depth: 13/31 00:01:27 24648kN 1.Ne5 fxe5 2.Reh3 Qf7 3.h7+ Kh8 4.Qxf7 exd4 5.Rg1 Rf8 +- (6.06) Depth: 13/33 00:01:32 26375kN 1.Ne5 fxe5 2.Reh3 Qf7 3.h7+ Kh8 4.Qxf7 Bxd4 5.Rc1 Rf8 +- (6.03) Depth: 14/32 00:02:09 39003kN 1.Nxg5 +- (6.06) Depth: 14/34 00:03:36 68508kN 1.Nxg5 fxg5 2.Reh3 Qf7 3.h7+ Kh8 4.Qxf7 Bxd4 5.Rd3 e5 +- (6.56) Depth: 14/42 00:04:22 82965kN (Williamson, Vancouver 06.10.2000)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.