Author: Jason Williamson
Date: 09:49:30 10/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 05, 2000 at 22:48:40, Steffen Jakob wrote: >Hi! > >Here comes a position from a game Hossa - Arasan: > >[D]r3r1k1/3q2p1/2p1ppQP/2P3p1/1p1P4/pPb1RN2/P4P2/1K5R w > >There are two moves which are winning fast: Ne5 and Nxg5 (e.g. 1.Nxg5 fxg5 2. >Reh3 +-). Hossa missed those moves and lost the game. First I thought that this >should be very easy to find for a comp but after having talked to some >programmers I saw that other programs also need more time than I expected (at >least too long for a blitz game). How long does your favourite program take to >see either Ne5 or Nxg5 with a +- score (something like +0.5 doesnt count)? > >Greetings, >Steffen. New position r3r1k1/3q2p1/2p1ppQP/2P3p1/1p1P4/pPb1RN2/P4P2/1K5R w - - 0 1 Analysis by Hiarcs 7.32: 1.Kc2 ³ (-0.51) Depth: 1 00:00:00 1.Kc2 Kf8 = (-0.07) Depth: 3/16 00:00:00 1.Kc2 Kf8 = (-0.07) Depth: 3/16 00:00:00 1.Kc2 Rec8 2.Qxg7+ = (-0.05) Depth: 3/16 00:00:00 1.Kc2 Bb2 ³ (-0.38) Depth: 4/17 00:00:00 1.Kc2 Bb2 2.h7+ Kh8 3.Qe4 ³ (-0.41) Depth: 4/17 00:00:00 1.Kc2 Bb2 2.h7+ Kh8 3.Re4 Rad8 ³ (-0.54) Depth: 5/17 00:00:00 17kN 1.Kc2 Rad8 2.Rd3 Qe7 3.h7+ Kh8 4.Qe4 Qd7 ³ (-0.30) Depth: 6/21 00:00:02 96kN 1.Kc2 Rad8 2.Rd3 Qe7 3.h7+ Kh8 4.Qe4 Qd7 ³ (-0.30) Depth: 7/23 00:00:05 245kN 1.Re5 Bxd4 2.Rxg5 fxg5 3.Nxg5 Bxf2 4.h7+ Kh8 5.Nf7+ Qxf7 6.Qxf7 Bxc5 = (-0.16) Depth: 7/25 00:00:20 942kN 1.Re5 Bxd4 = (0.09) Depth: 8/25 00:01:14 3309kN 1.Re5 Bxd4 2.Rxg5 fxg5 3.Nxg5 Bxc5 4.h7+ Kh8 5.Nf7+ Qxf7 6.Qxf7 e5 7.Rg1 Re7 8.Qf5 Bd4 9.Kc2 ± (1.31) Depth: 8/27 00:01:45 4642kN 1.Re5 Bxd4 2.Rxg5 fxg5 3.Nxg5 Bxc5 4.h7+ Kh8 5.Nf7+ Qxf7 6.Qxf7 Bd4 7.Rh4 Bf6 8.Rh3 Rad8 ± (1.26) Depth: 9/27 00:02:20 6199kN 1.Re5 Bxd4 +- (1.51) Depth: 10/29 00:07:22 19619kN (Williamson, Vancouver 06.10.2000)
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.