Author: Chessfun
Date: 11:18:43 10/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2000 at 13:58:28, Aaron Tay wrote: >On October 06, 2000 at 13:39:21, Christophe Theron wrote: > >>On October 06, 2000 at 11:35:42, Aaron Tay wrote: >> >>>On October 05, 2000 at 15:08:13, Harald Faber wrote: >>> >>>>Of course played by .... Gambit-Tiger. :) >>>> >>>>Enjoy it as much as I did! >>>>(It was a game against an old Mephisto, but in spite of this, this game is most >>>>outstanding I have ever seen) >>>> >>>> >>>>[Event "Test Gambit Tiger 0.95"] >>>>[Site ""] >>>>[Date "2000.10.05"] >>>>[Round ""] >>>>[White "Gambit Tiger 0.95"] >>>>[Black "Player"] >>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>[Opening "C47 Four Knights: Belgrade Gambit"] >>>> >>>>1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nd5 Nxe4 6.Qe2 f5 7.Ng5 d3 8.cxd3 Nd4 >>>>9.Qh5+ g6 10.Qh4 c6 11.Nc3 Nc2+ 12.Kd1 Nxa1 13.dxe4 Qf6 14.e5 Qxe5 15.Bc4 Be7 >>>>16.Re1 Qd6+ 17.Bd2 Qf6 18.Bf7+ Kd8 19.Rxe7 Kxe7 20.Nd5+ cxd5 21.Bb4+ d6 22.Bc3 >>>>Qxc3 23.bxc3 Kd7 24.Qd4 Rf8 >>>>25.Bxd5 Re8 26.Qg7+ Kd8 27.Bxb7 Bd7 28.Bxa8 h6 29.Nf7+ Kc7 30.Bd5 Re7 31.Qf6 >>>>Rxf7 32.Qxf7 Kd8 33.Qxg6 Kc7 34.c4 Ba4+ 35.Kd2 Bc6 36.c5 Bxd5 37.Qxd6+ Kc8 >>>>38.Qxd5 a5 39.Qf7 Nb3+ 40.axb3 Kd8 41.c6 a4 42.Qd7# 1-0 >>> >>>Sigh more Tiger Gambit hype..How about a serious discussion? I would nominate >>>the 2nd Deep blue game vers Kasparov in 1997, but because it allowed a possible >>>draw, the game wasn't perfect? >> >> >> >>Maybe people prefer to talk about Gambit Tiger because they know they can run >it on their own PC? You can't do that with Deep Blue... > > > >> Christophe > >No offence, but i have this feeling that this Gambit hype is beginning to feel a >little (not much but a little) like those CM postings except that this time the >personality is a Tiger one.. This isn't a personality it is an actual engine. >Firstly the misleading title..I didn't look at the game but surely you don't >think the game posted above is really the "best game ever played by a computer"? >Espically against a unknown opponent simply titled "player" The post was specific as to who player is it's an old mephisto. >Secondly, the need to report every single "amazing" win against GM.. GM? Mephisto is a computer. >I have no doubt that the new Tiger gambit personality will be amazing, and the >posting has not reached the level of the Daniel's level yet by far, but it will >get more irriating if this continues.. To me as long as it's on topic, I don't see the issue. >I hope the tiger beta testers will calm down as well..and avoid posting every >amazing game where Tiger smashs fritz or some Gm ... I think I myself have only posted one set of Tiger games and that was of Tiger 12.92 Beta. I don't think any of the others have made more than a couple each. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.