Author: Aaron Tay
Date: 11:27:00 10/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2000 at 14:18:43, Chessfun wrote: >On October 06, 2000 at 13:58:28, Aaron Tay wrote: > >>On October 06, 2000 at 13:39:21, Christophe Theron wrote: >> >>>On October 06, 2000 at 11:35:42, Aaron Tay wrote: >>> >>>>On October 05, 2000 at 15:08:13, Harald Faber wrote: >>>> >>>>>Of course played by .... Gambit-Tiger. :) >>>>> >>>>>Enjoy it as much as I did! >>>>>(It was a game against an old Mephisto, but in spite of this, this game is most >>>>>outstanding I have ever seen) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>[Event "Test Gambit Tiger 0.95"] >>>>>[Site ""] >>>>>[Date "2000.10.05"] >>>>>[Round ""] >>>>>[White "Gambit Tiger 0.95"] >>>>>[Black "Player"] >>>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>>[Opening "C47 Four Knights: Belgrade Gambit"] >>>>> >>>>>1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nd5 Nxe4 6.Qe2 f5 7.Ng5 d3 8.cxd3 Nd4 >>>>>9.Qh5+ g6 10.Qh4 c6 11.Nc3 Nc2+ 12.Kd1 Nxa1 13.dxe4 Qf6 14.e5 Qxe5 15.Bc4 Be7 >>>>>16.Re1 Qd6+ 17.Bd2 Qf6 18.Bf7+ Kd8 19.Rxe7 Kxe7 20.Nd5+ cxd5 21.Bb4+ d6 22.Bc3 >>>>>Qxc3 23.bxc3 Kd7 24.Qd4 Rf8 >>>>>25.Bxd5 Re8 26.Qg7+ Kd8 27.Bxb7 Bd7 28.Bxa8 h6 29.Nf7+ Kc7 30.Bd5 Re7 31.Qf6 >>>>>Rxf7 32.Qxf7 Kd8 33.Qxg6 Kc7 34.c4 Ba4+ 35.Kd2 Bc6 36.c5 Bxd5 37.Qxd6+ Kc8 >>>>>38.Qxd5 a5 39.Qf7 Nb3+ 40.axb3 Kd8 41.c6 a4 42.Qd7# 1-0 >>>> >>>>Sigh more Tiger Gambit hype..How about a serious discussion? I would nominate >>>>the 2nd Deep blue game vers Kasparov in 1997, but because it allowed a possible >>>>draw, the game wasn't perfect? >>> >>> >>> >>>Maybe people prefer to talk about Gambit Tiger because they know they can run >it on their own PC? You can't do that with Deep Blue... >> >> >> >>> Christophe >> >>No offence, but i have this feeling that this Gambit hype is beginning to feel a little (not much but a little) like those CM postings except that this time the personality is a Tiger one.. >This isn't a personality it is an actual engine. Semantics. It's a variation of Tiger. >>Firstly the misleading title..I didn't look at the game but surely you don't >>think the game posted above is really the "best game ever played by a computer"? >>Espically against a unknown opponent simply titled "player" >The post was specific as to who player is it's an old mephisto. You are right, I just glanced at the player..But my point still holds. How can this be considered the best game ever? >>Secondly, the need to report every single "amazing" win against GM.. > > >GM? Mephisto is a computer. I was refering here to the Mecking game.. >>I have no doubt that the new Tiger gambit personality will be amazing, and the >>posting has not reached the level of the Daniel's level yet by far, but it >>will get more irriating if this continues.. >To me as long as it's on topic, I don't see the issue. Okay. But i don't really like misleading subjects..And this thread is definitely misleading.. After all , the thread about CM testing started because of a misleading subject, and we don't want to be biased here don't we? >>I hope the tiger beta testers will calm down as well..and avoid posting every >>amazing game where Tiger smashs fritz or some Gm ... >I think I myself have only posted one set of Tiger games and that was >of Tiger 12.92 Beta. I don't think any of the others have made more than >a couple each. >Sarah Okay.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.