Author: Chessfun
Date: 15:48:25 10/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2000 at 18:44:33, Chessfun wrote: >On October 06, 2000 at 18:34:46, James T. Walker wrote: > >>On October 06, 2000 at 18:03:31, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >> >>>I got after 1 hour on K6-2+600 no result from Fritz6a, Gandalf 4.32f and Nimzo >>>2000b. >>>The moves are: 1.e4 e5 2.d4 d5 3. Nd2 de4: 4.Ne4: Nd7 5.Nf3 Ngf6 6.Nf6:+ Nf6: >>>7.Bg5 c5 8.Bb5+ Bd7 9.Bd7:+ Qd7: 10.Qe2 O-0-O 11.Td1 Qc7 12.O-O cd4: 13. Nd4: a6 >>> >>>14.Ne6:!! >>> >>>What about Gambit Tiger?? Looking for a genius. >> >>I'm missing the punch line here. What's wrong with pxN after 13. Nxd4?? And >>what is good about Ne6!! ? I guess there is a trap from prepared analysis here >>but I don't see it. (I'm not a GM) :-) >>Jim > > >Check here: >http://www.chesscenter.com/twic/event/chus2000/chusa10.html > >Sarah. I should have mentioned that 1. should read, 1. e4 e6. There is no pawn on e5. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.