Author: Chessfun
Date: 18:59:56 10/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2000 at 14:27:00, Aaron Tay wrote: >On October 06, 2000 at 14:18:43, Chessfun wrote: > >>On October 06, 2000 at 13:58:28, Aaron Tay wrote: >> >>>On October 06, 2000 at 13:39:21, Christophe Theron wrote: >>> >>>>On October 06, 2000 at 11:35:42, Aaron Tay wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 05, 2000 at 15:08:13, Harald Faber wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>Of course played by .... Gambit-Tiger. :) >>>>>> >>>>>>Enjoy it as much as I did! >>>>>>(It was a game against an old Mephisto, but in spite of this, this game is most >>>>>>outstanding I have ever seen) >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>[Event "Test Gambit Tiger 0.95"] >>>>>>[Site ""] >>>>>>[Date "2000.10.05"] >>>>>>[Round ""] >>>>>>[White "Gambit Tiger 0.95"] >>>>>>[Black "Player"] >>>>>>[Result "1-0"] >>>>>>[Opening "C47 Four Knights: Belgrade Gambit"] >>>>>> >>>>>>1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nd5 Nxe4 6.Qe2 f5 7.Ng5 d3 8.cxd3 Nd4 >>>>>>9.Qh5+ g6 10.Qh4 c6 11.Nc3 Nc2+ 12.Kd1 Nxa1 13.dxe4 Qf6 14.e5 Qxe5 15.Bc4 Be7 >>>>>>16.Re1 Qd6+ 17.Bd2 Qf6 18.Bf7+ Kd8 19.Rxe7 Kxe7 20.Nd5+ cxd5 21.Bb4+ d6 22.Bc3 >>>>>>Qxc3 23.bxc3 Kd7 24.Qd4 Rf8 >>>>>>25.Bxd5 Re8 26.Qg7+ Kd8 27.Bxb7 Bd7 28.Bxa8 h6 29.Nf7+ Kc7 30.Bd5 Re7 31.Qf6 >>>>>>Rxf7 32.Qxf7 Kd8 33.Qxg6 Kc7 34.c4 Ba4+ 35.Kd2 Bc6 36.c5 Bxd5 37.Qxd6+ Kc8 >>>>>>38.Qxd5 a5 39.Qf7 Nb3+ 40.axb3 Kd8 41.c6 a4 42.Qd7# 1-0 >>>>> >>>>>Sigh more Tiger Gambit hype..How about a serious discussion? I would nominate >>>>>the 2nd Deep blue game vers Kasparov in 1997, but because it allowed a possible >>>>>draw, the game wasn't perfect? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>Maybe people prefer to talk about Gambit Tiger because they know they can run >it on their own PC? You can't do that with Deep Blue... >>> >>> >>> >>>> Christophe >>> >>>No offence, but i have this feeling that this Gambit hype is beginning to feel a little (not much but a little) like those CM postings except that this time the personality is a Tiger one.. > > >>This isn't a personality it is an actual engine. > > >Semantics. It's a variation of Tiger. I think not. Not when those CM postings were at issue due to the personality settings and as noted this is an actual engine. > >>>Firstly the misleading title..I didn't look at the game but surely you don't >>>think the game posted above is really the "best game ever played by a computer"? >>>Espically against a unknown opponent simply titled "player" > > >>The post was specific as to who player is it's an old mephisto. > >You are right, I just glanced at the player..But my point still holds. >How can this be considered the best game ever? The posters opinion can be that it was, as can others share that opinion. I don't really think you have a point unless you at least play through the game. >>>Secondly, the need to report every single "amazing" win against GM.. >> >> >>GM? Mephisto is a computer. > >I was refering here to the Mecking game.. As far as I'm aware there was only that single game posted of Tiger beating a GM, so every single "amazing" win don't really hold. >>>I have no doubt that the new Tiger gambit personality will be amazing, and the >>>posting has not reached the level of the Daniel's level yet by far, but it >>will get more irriating if this continues.. > > >>To me as long as it's on topic, I don't see the issue. > >Okay. But i don't really like misleading subjects..And this thread is >definitely misleading.. But again how can you even say that without playing through the game and maybe saying why it isn't?. >After all , the thread about CM testing started because of a misleading subject, >and we don't want to be biased here don't we? In the posters opinion this could be the best game ever played by a computer. Does that mean the poster was biased? The difference was the other thread didn't specify that it was a human game as opposed to a CM tourney. Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.