Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 20:00:18 10/06/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 06, 2000 at 11:10:06, Will Singleton wrote: >On October 06, 2000 at 10:40:13, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 06, 2000 at 08:29:41, Peter Davison wrote: >> >>>On October 06, 2000 at 08:01:15, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>> >>>>On October 06, 2000 at 07:55:04, Mogens Larsen wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 06, 2000 at 07:47:14, Peter Davison wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>In the extensive thread: "Once again Dr. Hyatt is right on--He is a >>>>>>dispassionate observer", Bob Hyatt is asked: >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Then why bother replying since you make it clear you are not interested >>>>>>>in anything other than _insults_ when anyone questions anything. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>Sarah. >>>>>> >>>>>>Bob Hyatt replies in the relevent thread: >>>>>> >>>>>>"Again, back up to the beginning. I didn't insult _anybody_." >>>>>> >>>>>>"This shows your ignorance." >>>>>> >>>>>>"Please don't make statements where you know exactly _nothing_ about the topic >>>>>>you are talking about." >>>>>> >>>>>>"Consider your psychic abilities on a par with the rest of your comments. IE >>>>>>worthless." >>>>>> >>>>>>"thanks for sharing nothing new..." >>>>>> >>>>>>"Then do you get a kick out of posting "ho hum" non-news?" >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>In Bob's Forum, can Bob do whatever he wants? >>>> >>>>Apparently, he can or is it one of the perks of the moderator assignment? I >>>>wonder why comments like these are more acceptable than the Shredder incident. >>>>Maybe it's just too complicated to comprehend for someone like me. >>>> >>>>Mogens. >>> >>>Likely you understand the same as everyone else. Nobody dares do anything about >>>the ways of Bob. They just leave the group. >>> >>>This stuff has been going on since 1995 and before. Always debate / arguments. >>>Always Bob heavily involved. Always he uses the same style. Always he remains >>>and the others leave, or just restrain their posts to inconsequentials. You lost >>>a lot of good people in this way. >>> >>>Last one left standing. He always said it would be him. >> >> >>I would therefore like to suggest that you leave, since you believe that >>claptrap. If you ask prior moderators, you will find that I have had posts >>deleted. I didn't storm off angrily like someone I know. I didn't start >>attacking the moderators or anybody else. I simply thought "OK, I should >>have thought about writing that..." and went on with things. >> > >Uh, not that it really matters, but I can recall two or three distinct times >when you attacked moderators, then stormed off in a fit, taking whoever you >could with you. > >No big deal, of course. Us old guys do tend to forget things, though. :) > >Will I had two disagreements with moderators deleting things in a thread where they were actively participating. If you want to ask the other moderators about this thread, feel free. You will find that I have already responded to them that I don't feel comfortable taking any particular action here since my name is involved. However, I have had _plenty_ of my posts deleted. Some should have been deleted. Some were in threads that should have been deleted. Doesn't bother me so long as things are done 'sanely' and 'equitably'. That hasn't always been the case.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.