Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is 11.Nc3 a novelty of Gambit Tiger?

Author: Ed Schröder

Date: 01:28:58 10/07/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 07, 2000 at 03:52:22, Michel Langeveld wrote:

>It seems to be this variation is never player before and no it's not in the
>Tiger book but it IS in the rebelbook (rebel.mvs)

Typically Jeroen typing GM home analysis to the Rebel book.

Ed


>On October 07, 2000 at 00:16:52, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On October 06, 2000 at 23:41:34, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>This is from  a game of Rebel tiger that was posted here.
>>>
>>>[Event "Test Gambit Tiger 0.95"]
>>>[Site ""]
>>>[Date "2000.10.05"]
>>>[Round ""]
>>>[White "Gambit Tiger 0.95"]
>>>[Black "Player"]
>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>[Opening "C47 Four Knights: Belgrade Gambit"]
>>>
>>>1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nd5 Nxe4 6.Qe2 f5 7.Ng5 d3 8.cxd3 Nd4
>>>9.Qh5+ g6 10.Qh4 c6 11.Nc3
>>>
>>>I am interested to know if the last move is a novelty.
>>>If it is then my second question is if it a novelty of the engine or part of the
>>>book?
>>
>>Here is the resulting position:
>>[D]r1bqkb1r/pp1p3p/2p3p1/5pN1/3nn2Q/2NP4/PP3PPP/R1B1KB1R b KQkq -



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.