Author: Uri Blass
Date: 02:47:16 10/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2000 at 04:35:01, Jeroen Noomen wrote: >On October 06, 2000 at 23:41:34, Uri Blass wrote: Hi Jeroen, > >Hi Uri, > >>1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nd5 Nxe4 6.Qe2 f5 7.Ng5 d3 8.cxd3 Nd4 >>9.Qh5+ g6 10.Qh4 c6 11.Nc3 >> >>I am interested to know if the last move is a novelty. >>If it is then my second question is if it a novelty of the engine or part of >the book? > >It is not really a novelty, but a move analysed by a Belgrade gambit expert. It >is in Century's book, as well as in Tiger's book. I think the move can be very >dangerous, as soon as black takes the rook on a1 he will be lost. You may be right but I am not sure if black is lost after taking a1. I prefer the line of Rebel because there is no need to take risks with the knight on a1 but black has 2 pawns for the knight on a1 and can create chances when white tries to take the knight. There is no reason to get this unclear position when it seems to me that black can get an advantage by the line of Rebel (Nxc3 bxc3 Ne6) when black is a pawn up. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.