Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 07:19:28 10/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2000 at 10:01:55, Vincent Lejeune wrote:
>Why release 2 versions of Tiger ?
Because we are not sure which one is stronger, and because they are so different
in playing style.
I'm sure customers will appreciate to have the choice between a cold-minded,
solid program (Chess Tiger) and a ferocious attacker (Gambit Tiger).
>Is Gambit Tiger stronger against human ? or against computer ?
I don't know. The Gambit Tiger engine is too new to be sure.
My opinion is that the attacking abilities of Gambit Tiger will make it a very
tough opponent for human players.
It is unlikely that a game between Gambit Tiger and a human player is decided in
the endgame. It will be over much earlier. Look at the game against Mecking for
example.
>Will Chess Tiger extinct or "mutate" in the Gambit race ?
I hope I can mix the best of the two engines and offer a single engine with the
ability to set the "personality" to the taste of the user.
But at this time they are two different engines.
>Is Gambit-tiger more selective in the lines it analyse ?
Chess Tiger and Gambit Tiger have two different views of the chess game. They
don't play the same game actually.
That's why they are two different engines.
>Thank for this Tiger-Gambit little revolution ...
Thanks for your interest !
Christophe
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.