Author: Fernando Villegas
Date: 09:27:56 10/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2000 at 10:19:28, Christophe Theron wrote: >On October 07, 2000 at 10:01:55, Vincent Lejeune wrote: > >>Why release 2 versions of Tiger ? > > >Because we are not sure which one is stronger, and because they are so different >in playing style. > >I'm sure customers will appreciate to have the choice between a cold-minded, >solid program (Chess Tiger) and a ferocious attacker (Gambit Tiger). > > > >>Is Gambit Tiger stronger against human ? or against computer ? > > >I don't know. The Gambit Tiger engine is too new to be sure. > >My opinion is that the attacking abilities of Gambit Tiger will make it a very >tough opponent for human players. > >It is unlikely that a game between Gambit Tiger and a human player is decided in >the endgame. It will be over much earlier. Look at the game against Mecking for >example. > > > >>Will Chess Tiger extinct or "mutate" in the Gambit race ? > > >I hope I can mix the best of the two engines and offer a single engine with the >ability to set the "personality" to the taste of the user. > >But at this time they are two different engines. > > > >>Is Gambit-tiger more selective in the lines it analyse ? > > >Chess Tiger and Gambit Tiger have two different views of the chess game. They >don't play the same game actually. > >That's why they are two different engines. > > > >>Thank for this Tiger-Gambit little revolution ... > > >Thanks for your interest ! > > > > Christophe It would be too much to expect from you something more about that difference? Fernando
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.