Author: Chessfun
Date: 15:12:51 10/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2000 at 17:25:24, Uri Blass wrote:
>On October 07, 2000 at 15:33:03, Chris Taylor wrote:
>
>>Tiger is beating Crafty 17.10. It may change overnight? I will give the final
>>result when I stop the two playing? Here, is an indicator of Tiger's aggresive
>>play.
>>Crafty is no pushover, never has been, never will be!! In my opinion Crafty is
>>a good mover? On this occasion though, Tiger shows its claws.
>>
>>Chris Taylor.....
>>
>>Tiger is running on an AMD 500 96 meg ram
>>
>>[Event "Blitz:60'"]
>>[Site "Nottingham"]
>>[Date "2000.10.07"]
>>[Round "4"]
>>[White "Tiger 0.92 Gambit Beta"]
>>[Black "Crafty 17.10 Chessbase version"]
>>[Result "1-0"]
>>[ECO "B50"]
>>[Annotator "0.16"]
>>[PlyCount "59"]
>>[EventDate "2000.09.18"]
>>
>>{128MB, General.ctg. Celeron 500
>>} 1. e4 {0} 1... c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} 2... d6 {0} 3.
>>Nc3 {0} 3... Nf6 {0} 4. g3 {0} 4... Nc6 {0} 5. Bg2 {0} 5... e6 {0} 6. O-O {0}
>>6... Be7 {0} 7. d3 {0} 7... O-O {0} 8. Bf4 {1} 8... e5 {
>>last book move 0.16/12 104} 9. Be3 {72} 9... Be6 {0.12/11 100} 10. a3 {75}
>>10... h6 {0.04/11 194} 11. h3 {119} 11... Qd7 {-0.21/11 92} 12. g4 {55} 12...
>>d5 {-0.24/12 89} 13. exd5 {276} 13... Nxd5 {-0.28/13 0} 14. Nxd5 {77} 14...
>>Bxd5 {-0.30/12 87} 15. c4 {184} 15... Be6 {-0.47/12 84} 16. Nh2 {55} 16... Rfd8
>>{-0.78/11 114} 17. Be4 {103} 17... f5 {-0.60/12 0} 18. gxf5 {42} 18... Bxf5 {
>>-0.68/12 36} 19. Qf3 {79} 19... Bxh3 {-0.99/11 84} 20. Qh5 {44}
>
>
>An interesting sacrifice.
>What is Gambittiger's evaluation?
>
> 20... Bxf1 {
>>-1.86/10 99} 21. Kxf1 {0} 21... Qe8 {-1.96/10 76} 22. Bg6 {285} 22... Qf8 {
>>-1.69/12 70} 23. Ng4 {80} 23... Bd6 {-1.51/11 1}
>
>I think that this move is bad.
Gambit 0.95...there is no 0.92.
; 00:00:00.8 20. Score: -0.02 depth: 5 Qh5 Nd4 Rfc1 Qe6 Bd5 Rxd5 cxd5
; 00:00:00.3 20. Score: -0.26 depth: 6 Qh5 Nd4 Bxh6 gxh6 Qg6+ Kf8 Qxh6+ Kf7
Qg6+ Kf8
; 00:00:00.8 20. Score: -0.12 depth: 6 Rfe1 Nd4 Qg3 Qe6 Bxb7 Rab8
; 00:00:01.8 20. Score: -0.20 depth: 7 Rfe1 Rf8 Qg3 Bg5 Bxg5 hxg5 Re3 Bf5
; 00:00:02.4 20. Score: 0.10 depth: 7 Qh5 Bxf1 Kxf1 Nd4 Ng4 Qe6 Kg2 Ne2
; 00:00:05.6 20. Score: 0.30 depth: 8 Qh5 Nd4 Bxh6 Bxf1 Bd5+ Ne6 Nxf1 gxh6
Qg6+ Kf8 Bxe6 Qxd3 Qxh6+
; 00:00:10.9 20. Score: 0.28 depth: 9 Qh5 Nd4 Bxh6 Qe6 Be3 Bf5 Kg2 Bxe4+
dxe4 Nc2 Ng4 Nxa1 Rxa1
; 00:00:21.5 20. Score: 0.12 depth: 10 Qh5 Nd4 Bxh6 Qe6 Be3 Bf5 Bd5 Rxd5
cxd5 Qg6+ Qxg6 Bxg6 Rfe1
; 00:00:52.5 20. Score: 0.04 depth: 11 Qh5 Nd4 Bxh6 Bf5 Bd5+ Be6 Qg4 Bf8
Qg5 Ne2+ Kg2 Bxd5+ cxd5 Qxd5+ Nf3
>[D]r2r1qk1/pp2b1p1/2n3Bp/2p1p2Q/2P3N1/P2PB3/1P3P2/R4K2 b - - 0 1
>
>23...Rd6 is better.
>
>Crafty17.10 says 23...Rd6 -0.77/12
>Unfortunately Crafty had not enough time to find this move.
>
>I am interested to know if Gambittiger can win after 23...Rd6.
>What is Gambit tiger's move and evaluation after 23...Rd6?
; 00:00:00.9 2. Score: -0.02 depth: 7 Bxh6 Rxg6 Qxg6 Qf7 Qxf7+ Kxf7 Be3 Rf8
Re1 Kg8
; 00:00:00.3 2. Score: 0.14 depth: 7 Kg2 Nd4 Nxe5 Rf6 Rg1 Nc2 Nd7 Nxe3+
fxe3
; 00:00:03.8 2. Score: 0.52 depth: 8 Kg2 Nd4 Nxe5 Rf6 Rh1 Rd8 Ng4 Rf3
; 00:00:04.6 2. Score: 0.14 depth: 9 Kg2 Nd4 Nxe5 Rf6 Rg1 Nf5 b3 Nxe3+ fxe3
Rf2+ Kh1 Bd6
; 00:00:15.9 2. Score: -0.42 depth: 10 Kg2 Nd4 Nxe5 Qf6 Rh1 Nc6 Bf7+ Kf8 f4
Nxe5 fxe5 Qxf7 exd6 Qxh5 Rxh5
; 00:00:16.1 2. Score: -0.10 depth: 10 Bxh6 Rxg6 Qxg6 Qf7 Qe4 Rf8 Re1 Bh4
Be3 Nd4 Nxe5
; 00:00:21.2 2. Score: 0.02 depth: 10 Re1 Rad8 Kg2 Nd4 Nxe5 Rf6 Rg1 Nc2 Bc1
Rxf2+ Kh1
; 00:00:49.0 2. Score: 0.01 depth: 11 Re1 Rad8 Kg2 Nd4 Nxe5 Rf6 Rg1 Bd6 Ng4
Rxg6 Qxg6 Qf3+ Kf1
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.