Author: Chessfun
Date: 15:16:16 10/07/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2000 at 18:12:51, Chessfun wrote:
>On October 07, 2000 at 17:25:24, Uri Blass wrote:
>
>>On October 07, 2000 at 15:33:03, Chris Taylor wrote:
>>
>>>Tiger is beating Crafty 17.10. It may change overnight? I will give the final
>>>result when I stop the two playing? Here, is an indicator of Tiger's aggresive
>>>play.
>>>Crafty is no pushover, never has been, never will be!! In my opinion Crafty is
>>>a good mover? On this occasion though, Tiger shows its claws.
>>>
>>>Chris Taylor.....
>>>
>>>Tiger is running on an AMD 500 96 meg ram
>>>
>>>[Event "Blitz:60'"]
>>>[Site "Nottingham"]
>>>[Date "2000.10.07"]
>>>[Round "4"]
>>>[White "Tiger 0.92 Gambit Beta"]
>>>[Black "Crafty 17.10 Chessbase version"]
>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>[ECO "B50"]
>>>[Annotator "0.16"]
>>>[PlyCount "59"]
>>>[EventDate "2000.09.18"]
>>>
>>>{128MB, General.ctg. Celeron 500
>>>} 1. e4 {0} 1... c5 {0} 2. Nf3 {0} 2... d6 {0} 3.
>>>Nc3 {0} 3... Nf6 {0} 4. g3 {0} 4... Nc6 {0} 5. Bg2 {0} 5... e6 {0} 6. O-O {0}
>>>6... Be7 {0} 7. d3 {0} 7... O-O {0} 8. Bf4 {1} 8... e5 {
>>>last book move 0.16/12 104} 9. Be3 {72} 9... Be6 {0.12/11 100} 10. a3 {75}
>>>10... h6 {0.04/11 194} 11. h3 {119} 11... Qd7 {-0.21/11 92} 12. g4 {55} 12...
>>>d5 {-0.24/12 89} 13. exd5 {276} 13... Nxd5 {-0.28/13 0} 14. Nxd5 {77} 14...
>>>Bxd5 {-0.30/12 87} 15. c4 {184} 15... Be6 {-0.47/12 84} 16. Nh2 {55} 16... Rfd8
>>>{-0.78/11 114} 17. Be4 {103} 17... f5 {-0.60/12 0} 18. gxf5 {42} 18... Bxf5 {
>>>-0.68/12 36} 19. Qf3 {79} 19... Bxh3 {-0.99/11 84} 20. Qh5 {44}
>>
>>
>>An interesting sacrifice.
>>What is Gambittiger's evaluation?
>>
>> 20... Bxf1 {
>>>-1.86/10 99} 21. Kxf1 {0} 21... Qe8 {-1.96/10 76} 22. Bg6 {285} 22... Qf8 {
>>>-1.69/12 70} 23. Ng4 {80} 23... Bd6 {-1.51/11 1}
>>
>>I think that this move is bad.
>
>
>Gambit 0.95...there is no 0.92.
>
>; 00:00:00.8 20. Score: -0.02 depth: 5 Qh5 Nd4 Rfc1 Qe6 Bd5 Rxd5 cxd5
>; 00:00:00.3 20. Score: -0.26 depth: 6 Qh5 Nd4 Bxh6 gxh6 Qg6+ Kf8 Qxh6+ Kf7
>Qg6+ Kf8
>; 00:00:00.8 20. Score: -0.12 depth: 6 Rfe1 Nd4 Qg3 Qe6 Bxb7 Rab8
>; 00:00:01.8 20. Score: -0.20 depth: 7 Rfe1 Rf8 Qg3 Bg5 Bxg5 hxg5 Re3 Bf5
>; 00:00:02.4 20. Score: 0.10 depth: 7 Qh5 Bxf1 Kxf1 Nd4 Ng4 Qe6 Kg2 Ne2
>; 00:00:05.6 20. Score: 0.30 depth: 8 Qh5 Nd4 Bxh6 Bxf1 Bd5+ Ne6 Nxf1 gxh6
>Qg6+ Kf8 Bxe6 Qxd3 Qxh6+
>; 00:00:10.9 20. Score: 0.28 depth: 9 Qh5 Nd4 Bxh6 Qe6 Be3 Bf5 Kg2 Bxe4+
>dxe4 Nc2 Ng4 Nxa1 Rxa1
>; 00:00:21.5 20. Score: 0.12 depth: 10 Qh5 Nd4 Bxh6 Qe6 Be3 Bf5 Bd5 Rxd5
>cxd5 Qg6+ Qxg6 Bxg6 Rfe1
>; 00:00:52.5 20. Score: 0.04 depth: 11 Qh5 Nd4 Bxh6 Bf5 Bd5+ Be6 Qg4 Bf8
>Qg5 Ne2+ Kg2 Bxd5+ cxd5 Qxd5+ Nf3
>
>
>
>>[D]r2r1qk1/pp2b1p1/2n3Bp/2p1p2Q/2P3N1/P2PB3/1P3P2/R4K2 b - - 0 1
>>
>>23...Rd6 is better.
>>
>>Crafty17.10 says 23...Rd6 -0.77/12
>>Unfortunately Crafty had not enough time to find this move.
It was the move Gambit 0.95 expected;
; 00:00:00.7 1. Score: -0.82 depth: 6 Nd4 Nxe5 Rd6 b4 Nc2 Bf7+ Kh8
; 00:00:00.0 1. Score: -0.66 depth: 6 Rd6 Bxh6 Rxg6 Qxg6 Qf7 Qe4 Bh4
; 00:00:00.9 1. Score: -0.82 depth: 7 Rd6 Bxh6 Rxg6 Qxg6 Qf7 Qe4 Rf8 Be3
; 00:00:02.6 1. Score: -0.62 depth: 8 Rd6 Re1 Rb8 Kg2 Nd4 Nxe5 Rf6 Rg1
; 00:00:06.9 1. Score: -0.48 depth: 9 Rd6 Kg2 Nd4 Nxe5 Rf6 Rg1 Nf5 Ng4
Nxe3+ fxe3 Rf3
; 00:00:16.2 1. Score: -0.25 depth: 10 Rd6 Rc1 Rxg6 Qxg6 Qe8 Nxh6+ Kh8 Nf7+
Kg8 Nh6+
; 00:01:01.5 1. Score: -0.22 depth: 11 Rd6 b4 cxb4 axb4 Nxb4 Ke2 e4 Bxe4
Qf7 Bh7+ Kf8 Qe5 Nc2 Rxa7 Rxa7 Bxa7
Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.