Author: Harald Faber
Date: 01:09:57 10/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2000 at 04:33:22, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 07, 2000 at 03:55:10, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On October 06, 2000 at 18:03:31, Thomas Lagershausen wrote: >> >>>I got after 1 hour on K6-2+600 no result from Fritz6a, Gandalf 4.32f and Nimzo >>>2000b. >>>The moves are: 1.e4 e5 2.d4 d5 3. Nd2 de4: 4.Ne4: Nd7 5.Nf3 Ngf6 6.Nf6:+ Nf6: >>>7.Bg5 c5 8.Bb5+ Bd7 9.Bd7:+ Qd7: 10.Qe2 O-0-O 11.Td1 Qc7 12.O-O cd4: 13. Nd4: a6 >>> >>>14.Ne6:!! >>> >>>What about Gambit Tiger?? Looking for a genius. >> >>What are the main lines? > >[D]2kr1b1r/1pq2ppp/p3pn2/6B1/3N4/8/PPP1QPPP/3R1RK1 w - - 0 1 > >The main line is the line of the game(a link to the game was posted by >chessfun): > >14.Ne6 fxe6 15.Qxe6+ Rd7 16.Bxf6 gxf6 17.Rd4 Bc5 18.Rc4 > >programs can see that black has no good alternative when I use more than one >option and they can also see that after this line white has a clear advantage. > >If I start from the position after 18.Rc4 wait to get the move 18...Kb8 with >clear advantage for white and go back (using programs with learning function) >then they have no problem to see that 14.Ne6 is best. > >Uri Oh yes, 17.Rd4! is a very strong move, I only looked at 17.Qxf6. Gambit Tiger does not want to play Nxe6 within 30min/K7-500 and prefers Rd3 with +1.16 which is also not a bad move...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.