Author: Uri Blass
Date: 09:48:04 10/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2000 at 12:39:41, Oliver Roese wrote: >On October 08, 2000 at 12:25:13, Uri Blass wrote: > >>On October 08, 2000 at 12:20:43, Oliver Roese wrote: >><snipped> >>>In opening and (very late) endgame computers act (almost) optimally. >> >>Humans play in the same way in the first moves of the opening. >> >In the same way? >You know that this is not true. I mean that both computers and most of the humans play from book and do not use time to calculate in the first moves. > >>When computers are in book in move 15 or move 20 they do not play almost >>optimally because they can follow not optimal known moves. >> >Thats true, but i didnt intend to say anything against that. > >>Humans who analyzed the relevant opening can find a novelty and get an >>advantage. >> >True, but modern software has learning facilities to protect against this, so >you must be _very_ creative to make a living of it. >I think in practice its effect is rather limited I believe that the best GM's can play the regular theory lines without being at disadvantage against computers. They may sometimes even get an advantage from novelties that they prepared. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.