Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 10:59:25 10/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2000 at 20:35:33, Djordje Vidanovic wrote: >Hello Andrew, > >I have already posted on the same subject some weeks ago and asked "Peter >Davison" to try to be constructive or else... Now, I believe that the time of >the "else" has arrived... One can get a rather good idea about his (not) having >something to offer by perusing the Oxford Software forum (I keep forgetting the >name of the place) where there were only two or three posters I believe. Had >P.T. had anything to offer, that forum would have flourished, right? An interesting message though devoid of any logic whatsoever in my opinion. There's a few things I would like you to clarify given the above message. What would it take to be a constructive member of this forum and what are the consequences if you're deemed not to be such a member? Furthermore, is this newfound requirement for constructive participation only aimed at certain members considered dubious by the moderators, or is it an attempt to add something to the charter in the nearby future? It would be nice to know, because then I would have to scrap several unconstructive comments in the future, leaving a lot of spare time unused. Djordje, I thought you knew better than to indirectly support a fellow moderator, who without reason insulted a very respected member of this forum. It can't be the purpose of a moderator to set a poor example by behaving in a rude and confrontational way. The reasonable responses from Peter Davison and now Amir Ban shouldn't be ignored when there's an obvious point to be made. From the outside it appears as if Dann and you are incapable of independent thought. I hope this isn't the case. Sincerely, Mogens PS: Congratulations on your recent elections. I hope this leads to peace and prosperity in your country.
This page took 0.02 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.