Author: Oliver Roese
Date: 12:01:27 10/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 07, 2000 at 07:07:37, Gian-Carlo Pascutto wrote: >On October 07, 2000 at 04:44:52, José Carlos wrote: > >> I'm thinking of releasing the source code of this version of Averno (0.31) >>which seems stable and debugged. >> I'm afraid, though, of _incorrect_ use the source code, so I'd like to join >>the GLP, or something like that. Anyway, I'm only willing to release source >code of this version, I'll think what to do in next versions. Do this fit into >GLP? > >You're probably referring to the GPL, the GNU Public License. It's a good >license, but I do recommend that you read it *very* carefully. > >As the copyright holder, you can use whatever license you want for the >versions you release, so using the GPL will not affect what you can >do for future versions. You can even distribute the version you >published under GPL with a different license if you want to. But only >_you_ will be able to do this, the rest of the people have to use GPL >or nothing. > I dont believe that this is so. At least i hope it is not so. I think it is against the spirit of free software. Why do you think, that this so? Can you give a reference? >The GPL itself has detailed instructions on how to apply it to your >sources. For more info, refer to http://www.gnu.org > >>Is anybody interested in my code? I don't really have time to write good >>comments, and maybe some of the comments that are in the code are kind of >stupid (probably :)). >>Well, I'd like to here opinions about this, that can help me make my >>decision. > >Having code, even if it is lousy, is better than not having anything >at all ;) > >-- >GCP
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.