Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:33:43 10/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2000 at 23:20:52, Chessfun wrote: >On October 08, 2000 at 22:21:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>I challenge you to support that with facts. Please re-read the thread from >>the beginning and see who insulted who first. Your "interpretation" is wrong. > > >Here is the first insult Dr. and it happens to be one of yours. Why don't you read it first. And then answer the following: 1. Why did you suggest that I had noplayed 1/2 the beta testers? somewhat insulting. IMHO. 2. please list _all_ the beta testers accounts. Then list at least 1/2 of those that were noplayed. Since you deal in "facts". 3. Then please explain why you made that comment if not to 'insult'. 4. then explain why you think this message supports _your_ position that I "threw the first stone"... As I said, things are not what you seem to want to imply. BTW, if it was the "ignorance" word you don't like, please look it up, and notice how I used it in the sentence. It was perfect. Because you don't _know_ who I have noplayed, nor why. So when you make statements about _my_ noplay list, they _are_ made in ignorance. Where ignorance == lack of any information of any kind about the point being discussed. And of course, feel free to try to convince me that the noplay comment was not meant to be insulting. Nothing slips with age, except tolerance for nonsense. You will realize that in a few years. > >Naturally memory slips with age....oh well. >http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?131533 > >Sarah.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.