Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 21:43:37 10/08/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2000 at 23:29:07, Chessfun wrote: >On October 08, 2000 at 23:18:01, Chessfun wrote: > >>On October 08, 2000 at 22:27:38, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>If you will check again, I did _not_ post the _first_ insult. And yes, I >>>consider being called a liar an insult. I belive you also did the same thing >>>a while back and I responded the same way. I don't make up lies. You were >>>quite capable of taking a single game, observing a bizarre behavior by my >>>program, and then extrapolated that I programmed it to behave that way on >>>purpose, to be abusive. I explained what happened. Did you retract your >>>statement? not a chance. And when I get angry about such nonsense, _I_ am >>>at fault it seems. >> >>I already let you have the last word. >>You should have left it there. >> >>I simply asked questions and stated my opinions. >> >>Fact....you did post the first insult; >>http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?131533 >> >>And _fact_ you consider being questioned, and someone stating >>there opinions to be calling you a liar. >> >> >>Sarah. > >Seems you won on both threads; >http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?131534 > >Sarah. Lets recap _this_ thread too. The orignal post used the GM game to say that the new gambit tiger is remarkable. I posted a response that _all_ programs beat GM players at blitz. All the time. In the prior post to the one you linked to above, you said "but this is GM Mecking". I responded "do you get a kick out of posting ho-hum news, then?" WHERE is the insult in that? That is a simple question. No names. No implied junk as you did in the noplay comment in the other part of the thread. Just a simple question. And that is an insult? Better go check your Webster's. Your definition of the word is wrong.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.