Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 00:40:30 10/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 08, 2000 at 22:21:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: >No. It was simply directed at someone that has been known to try to stir >up a controversy, for the sake of doing so. So it's thereby better to stir up trouble in advance to avoid that? Why not simply ignore what he has to say if his attempts are as ludicrous as you portrait them to be? Seems simple enough to me. The reason for this is that you can't resist arguing. >I challenge you to support that with facts. Please re-read the thread from >the beginning and see who insulted who first. Your "interpretation" is wrong. That shouldn't be necessary. It would hardly be productive to repeat your ill willed comments aimed at Sarah once again. With a little effort I think most people would find my interpretation to be correct, finding no veiled insults in the initial messages posted by the member in question. Otherwise I'm amazed that you haven't insulted others the last couple of days. Robert, I've asked you several questions in the past, some of which have been either stupid or stubborn, without getting insulted in any way. Don't you think you should extend that level of courtesy to include Sarah as well, or any other member? Especially since you're now wearing the moderator cap. Remeber, it's a cap, not a crown after all. Mogens.
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.