Author: Chris Whittington
Date: 03:23:16 12/23/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 22, 1997 at 22:47:27, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>Try girlfriend or family instead of this alienated, alienating chess >>software. > >If the girl-friend evaluates a position in the same artificial and >intelligent way Mchess7 is doing it, I would - for sure - try her >(whatever this means to you). > > >>>I wish you all a good christmas ! And good games ! >> >>I wish you a life. > >But I have a live. Have girls and chess-software. >I know you have more than I have, but I was never interested in >quantities chris. > >Look, you have maybe up to 10 people in your hourse, counting the cats >and the dog etc. >And you have ONE chess program you are working on all the time. > >With me it is vice versa. >I have normally ONE girl and up to 15 programs ! :-) > >Since Chrilly Donninger has given us the autoplayers, operating a >chess-program can be substituted by operating a girl. Move now ? Self-play ? You have keyboard short-cuts, I presume ? > I do like this >very much and will ever be thankful to Chrilly for this ethical present. > >Chris - I have heard weird ideas HOW junior works. It should work >different than other computer programs concerning the search and the way >it evaluates. >Since I have no Junior (some people have beta-versions) yet this is all >speculation. But it would fit into my few info's I have seen in >Paderborn AND in Paris, although the junior screen was never showing >much information. > >Why has junior ALMOST ALWAYS a long main-line ? >Is it's NPS higher than Fritz5' NPS ? >Or is it not possible to relate because Fritz5 NPS measures a different >thing than Junior's ? Don't know. Also past caring about it. Does it make any difference to the grand scheme of things ? I doubt it. > >Whatever. >We will see. We will see what we want. > >I am wondering why you tell me I should live with a girl but instead of >beeing with your family you post messages here. >Could it be possible that you - from time to time - need some hours for >relaxing yourself from beeing a father/boss too ? >If so - please don't always be in such a bad "anti-family" mood. >When you post here you are often very aggressive and I have no idea why. Generally pissed off. Very pissed off with the computer chess community. Think that this board was a mistake. It should either have been a private club, or else not have had the ability to ban RT. Its too clique-y. It has a mob that turns on anybody, the KK thing is a case in point. My fault, I played a large part in setting it up, and I failed to see that the original intention to dispose of RT, to form a non-RT club, was going also to result in an 'in-gang' with an inevitable culture of in-ness/clique-ness and an ensuing inevitable anihilation/expulsion/exclusion of its self-defined outsiders. First they came for Tueschen, and I didn't protest etc. etc. etc. You know the poem, we've had cause to quote it before, no ? Possibly the greatest potential problem (never considered) will be the sponsors power, already used, no ? >Maybe we should continue our daily telephone calls. Pfah. I'm not keeping you in with your daily fix of updates. >I had the idea you >were in better mood in those times... Mood ? Yeah, lets be in good mood and play with our programs :( I think not in my case. Chris Whittington > > > >>Chris Whittington
This page took 0.03 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.