Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 04:09:22 10/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2000 at 04:46:01, pavel wrote: >lets not even go to fritz6a, just yet... > >IMO gandalf 4.32f is not even 'better' than the, >"best -freeware- winboard engine" Yes. It is. >I can kick myself for buying it only by listening to the reviews of >beta-testers.. :( $30 bucks down the drain. > >I would certainly not recommend anyone to buy it, well, if you want to collect >chess program than thats something else. > >it gets completely smacked-down by nimzo2000b, and top programs like crafty and >yace under winboard. That's a result limited to your machine, judging from results against posted by Christian Koch and Frank Quisinsky. Not to mention my own experiences. >_I_would rate it atleast 50elo less than crafty-yace (assuming they are in same >level). It isn't and they're not. >as jauni said its not a blitz player....TRUE, also its not a standard time >control player either :( (to the top level) The small test you posted doesn't really give you any basis for speculation in that regard. Rather pathetic IMHO. Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.