Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:30:32 10/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2000 at 00:56:03, Chessfun wrote: >On October 09, 2000 at 00:43:37, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 08, 2000 at 23:29:07, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On October 08, 2000 at 23:18:01, Chessfun wrote: >>> >>>>On October 08, 2000 at 22:27:38, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>>> >>>>>If you will check again, I did _not_ post the _first_ insult. And yes, I >>>>>consider being called a liar an insult. I belive you also did the same thing >>>>>a while back and I responded the same way. I don't make up lies. You were >>>>>quite capable of taking a single game, observing a bizarre behavior by my >>>>>program, and then extrapolated that I programmed it to behave that way on >>>>>purpose, to be abusive. I explained what happened. Did you retract your >>>>>statement? not a chance. And when I get angry about such nonsense, _I_ am >>>>>at fault it seems. >>>> >>>>I already let you have the last word. >>>>You should have left it there. >>>> >>>>I simply asked questions and stated my opinions. >>>> >>>>Fact....you did post the first insult; >>>>http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?131533 >>>> >>>>And _fact_ you consider being questioned, and someone stating >>>>there opinions to be calling you a liar. >>>> >>>> >>>>Sarah. >>> >>>Seems you won on both threads; >>>http://site2936.dellhost.com/forums/1/message.shtml?131534 >>> >>>Sarah. >> >> >>Lets recap _this_ thread too. The orignal post used the GM game to say that >>the new gambit tiger is remarkable. >> >>I posted a response that _all_ programs beat GM players at blitz. All the >>time. >> >>In the prior post to the one you linked to above, you said "but this is GM >>Mecking". >> >>I responded "do you get a kick out of posting ho-hum news, then?" > >Considering I didn't even post the message I thought it was laughable >and proved that you don't even know half the time what you are replying >to. > >>WHERE is the insult in that? That is a simple question. No names. No >>implied junk as you did in the noplay comment in the other part of the >>thread. Just a simple question. And that is an insult? > >So, by your own definition now my previous statement that you >claim as being an insult is NOT an insult. > >You got all caught up in your own web of stories. > >Sarah. I'm not caught up in anything. I posted that a GM loss to a computer in blitz is not news at all. Even weak programs do this regularly. You argued that this game was important. I simply asked the direct question to stop beating around the bush. I didn't claim that your statement was an insult (in that post). Nor would I say my response was an insult. As I did say, that was _not_ the start of any strong replies by me. But go to the very next post and see what you wrote there...
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.