Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Moderation issue: Seirawan lost to Benjamin, loses lead with ...

Author: Robert Hyatt

Date: 07:37:14 10/09/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 09, 2000 at 03:28:35, Ed Schröder wrote:

>On October 08, 2000 at 22:57:58, Robert Hyatt wrote:
>
>>>There was absolute no need for the moderators to interfere. Remember the
>>>occasion when you was subject to moderation? How did it feel? That's what
>>>you are doing each time you interfere so it better should be big when you
>>>decide to speak as a moderator using your power, because that is the
>>>position you have as an elected moderator.
>
>
>>NOBODY interfered.
>
>Yes you did.
>
>When I asked you the question if you were talking as CCC member or
>as CCC moderator you said the latter.
>
>Ed


Please.  It seems definitions are very _loose_ today.  Go look up "interfere"
and then tell me how I interefered in any of the chessmaster threads, in any
way or fashion.  I _asked_ the poster to choose more suitable subject lines.
I didn't prevent him from posting _anything_.  I didn't remove _anything_.
I didn't threaten to remove _anything_.  I didn't threaten any kind of action
at _all_.

So exactly how did I interfere?  Or "get in the way of his using CCC" which
is what the word means...



This page took 0.01 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.