Author: Christophe Theron
Date: 10:15:11 10/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2000 at 06:41:55, Thorsten Czub wrote:
>On October 08, 2000 at 16:38:12, Christophe Theron wrote:
>
>>And what about starting the attack to create a positional advantage? :)
>
>indeed...
>
>>Current chess programs most of the time do nothing but wait for the opponent's
>>mistake.
>
>right.
>
>>Time to move on I think. Chris Whittington partially succeeded. I'm the other
>>Chris, I'm the second blade. Maybe I'll cut the hair this time. :)
>
>Hail (french-)Champion :-)))
>these are the right words. Shift the paradigm.
>When Chris started making Complete-Chess-System into ChessSystemTal
>it wasn`t a very strong program. Your Gambit-Tiger has a completely
>different and stronger basement to continue this idea.
>Welcome in the club ! This is the mirror world.
>We are fighting the romans. They believe chess has to be boring.
>And has to be accurate. Pah !
>They are afraid.
>There is no accurate chess, despite tablebases.
>
>I am looking forward
>that the ideas will start a revolution.
>This paradigm has to be teared down.
>
>
>BTW: on my p2/233 CSTal would like to play Qh5 after
>
>d8 244s with -0.29
>d9 913s with -0.14
>d10 1664s with -0.26
>
>what is gambit-tigers score in this position ??
>
>[D]r2r2k1/pp1qb1p1/2n4p/2p1p3/2P1B3/P2PBQ1b/1P3P1N/R4RK1 w - - 0 1
>
>
>> Christophe
The evaluation is close to 0.
Gambit Tiger sees that it loses a quality but estimates it has counterplay.
However it is not overoptimistic, so maybe the opponent made a mistake later.
Christophe
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.