Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 11:01:32 10/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2000 at 10:37:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 09, 2000 at 03:28:35, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On October 08, 2000 at 22:57:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>>There was absolute no need for the moderators to interfere. Remember the >>>>occasion when you was subject to moderation? How did it feel? That's what >>>>you are doing each time you interfere so it better should be big when you >>>>decide to speak as a moderator using your power, because that is the >>>>position you have as an elected moderator. >> >> >>>NOBODY interfered. >> >>Yes you did. >> >>When I asked you the question if you were talking as CCC member or >>as CCC moderator you said the latter. >> >>Ed > > >Please. It seems definitions are very _loose_ today. Go look up "interfere" >and then tell me how I interefered in any of the chessmaster threads, in any >way or fashion. I _asked_ the poster to choose more suitable subject lines. >I didn't prevent him from posting _anything_. I didn't remove _anything_. >I didn't threaten to remove _anything_. I didn't threaten any kind of action >at _all_. >So exactly how did I interfere? BH wrote: >>>and when the threads here also have complaints about the subjects. I don't >>>mind the chessmaster threads, as I said during moderator elections. But I >>>don't like "world cup underway". A person can't hold a "world cup" event. ES: >>Fine with me as long as you say that as a CCC member. BH: >I believe that this falls under the moderator job description. Here for instance you admitted that your criticism to a header description was done in the role as moderator and not as being a CCC member. It is a warning to all CCC members. Do we need this? I don't think so. Which is and was my whole and only point. Ed
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.