Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Is 11.Nc3 a novelty of Gambit Tiger?

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 11:29:29 10/09/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 09, 2000 at 13:49:51, Dann Corbit wrote:

>On October 07, 2000 at 00:16:52, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On October 06, 2000 at 23:41:34, Uri Blass wrote:
>>
>>>This is from  a game of Rebel tiger that was posted here.
>>>
>>>[Event "Test Gambit Tiger 0.95"]
>>>[Site ""]
>>>[Date "2000.10.05"]
>>>[Round ""]
>>>[White "Gambit Tiger 0.95"]
>>>[Black "Player"]
>>>[Result "1-0"]
>>>[Opening "C47 Four Knights: Belgrade Gambit"]
>>>
>>>1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nc6 3.Nc3 Nf6 4.d4 exd4 5.Nd5 Nxe4 6.Qe2 f5 7.Ng5 d3 8.cxd3 Nd4
>>>9.Qh5+ g6 10.Qh4 c6 11.Nc3
>>>
>>>I am interested to know if the last move is a novelty.
>>>If it is then my second question is if it a novelty of the engine or part of the
>>>book?
>>
>>Here is the resulting position:
>
>[D]r1bqkb1r/pp1p3p/2p3p1/5pN1/3nn2Q/2NP4/PP3PPP/R1B1KB1R b KQkq -
>
>Here is some crafty analysis.  If it is a novelty, crafty did not find it.  What
>is the best possible line and response after Nc2+?

You can see the all the game in
http://www.icdchess.com/forums/1/message.shtml?131567

I believe that Qxe5 in the game was wrong but I also do not like Nc2+ because
the knight may be trapped.

I cannot see deep enough to prove or contradict it but I prefer simply Nxc3 bxc3
Ne6 when black is a pawn up.

Nxc3 bxc3 Ne6 is part of Rebel century's book for black.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.