Author: Vincent Diepeveen
Date: 16:10:40 10/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2000 at 17:41:40, Steve Maughan wrote:
I did next:
turn off transpositions and put 'pvmove=0' in hashtable.
So it's doing exactly the same but without transpositions and without
help from best moves out of hashtable:
1 22 ( 0, 21) 0.01
00:00 44 (0) 2 0.00 e2-e4
2 106 ( 0, 65) 0.03
00:00 196 (0) 3 0.12 e2-e4
00:00 331 (0) 3 0.19 Ng1-f3
00:00 529 (0) 3 0.33 d2-d4
3 638 ( 0, 305) 0.04
00:00 931 (0) 4 0.00 d2-d4
4 1836 ( 0, 781) 0.07
00:00 3276 (0) 5 0.11 d2-d4
00:00 5042 (0) 5 0.13 Ng1-f3
5 6940 ( 0, 2413) 0.17
00:00 10993 (0) 6 -0.02 Ng1-f3
00:00 16769 (0) 6 0.00 d2-d4
6 35325 ( 0, 15018) 0.76
00:01 78668 (0) 7 0.09 d2-d4
7 138186 ( 0, 60532) 2.82
00:03 180174 (0) 8 0.00 d2-d4
8 474445 ( 0, 179899) 8.95
00:15 813811 (0) 9 0.10 d2-d4
9 1109121 ( 0, 439433) 21.25
00:38 1965268 (0) 10 -0.00 d2-d4
So 21.25 seconds and 1109121 nodes to finish 9 ply.
>Bert,
>
>>Maybe you do more in the quiescence search. If you do a lot of check extensions
>>in your quiescence search than this will increase the number of nodes a lot.
>
>Actually I don't do any check extensions in the QSearch. I think it may be hash
>table and move ordering.
>
>Thanks for the input!
>
>Steve
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.