Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 19:50:11 10/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2000 at 14:01:32, Ed Schröder wrote: >On October 09, 2000 at 10:37:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 09, 2000 at 03:28:35, Ed Schröder wrote: >> >>>On October 08, 2000 at 22:57:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>> >>>>>There was absolute no need for the moderators to interfere. Remember the >>>>>occasion when you was subject to moderation? How did it feel? That's what >>>>>you are doing each time you interfere so it better should be big when you >>>>>decide to speak as a moderator using your power, because that is the >>>>>position you have as an elected moderator. >>> >>> >>>>NOBODY interfered. >>> >>>Yes you did. >>> >>>When I asked you the question if you were talking as CCC member or >>>as CCC moderator you said the latter. >>> >>>Ed >> >> >>Please. It seems definitions are very _loose_ today. Go look up "interfere" >>and then tell me how I interefered in any of the chessmaster threads, in any >>way or fashion. I _asked_ the poster to choose more suitable subject lines. >>I didn't prevent him from posting _anything_. I didn't remove _anything_. >>I didn't threaten to remove _anything_. I didn't threaten any kind of action >>at _all_. > > >>So exactly how did I interfere? > > >BH wrote: >>>>and when the threads here also have complaints about the subjects. I don't >>>>mind the chessmaster threads, as I said during moderator elections. But I >>>>don't like "world cup underway". A person can't hold a "world cup" event. > >ES: >>>Fine with me as long as you say that as a CCC member. > >BH: >>I believe that this falls under the moderator job description. > > >Here for instance you admitted that your criticism to a header description >was done in the role as moderator and not as being a CCC member. It is a >warning to all CCC members. > >Do we need this? I don't think so. Which is and was my whole and only point. > >Ed Why would it matter whether it was done as a member, a moderator, or by the president of the United States? Did you go to school? College? If you did, how on earth did you respond when a teacher criticized your writing style and suggested you do some things differently? That's all this was. A critical remark about the subject not agreeing with the body of the post. Any writing teacher would complain if the title of a paper had _nothing_ to do with the content. Or if the title was greatly misleading... I didn't even threaten to "flunk" him. :) Just asked him to be more reasonable in choosing the subject. That certainly fits within the definition of "moderator". Again from my Webster's...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.