Author: Ed Schröder
Date: 22:53:27 10/09/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 09, 2000 at 22:50:11, Robert Hyatt wrote: >On October 09, 2000 at 14:01:32, Ed Schröder wrote: > >>On October 09, 2000 at 10:37:14, Robert Hyatt wrote: >> >>>On October 09, 2000 at 03:28:35, Ed Schröder wrote: >>> >>>>On October 08, 2000 at 22:57:58, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>>>There was absolute no need for the moderators to interfere. Remember the >>>>>>occasion when you was subject to moderation? How did it feel? That's what >>>>>>you are doing each time you interfere so it better should be big when you >>>>>>decide to speak as a moderator using your power, because that is the >>>>>>position you have as an elected moderator. >>>> >>>> >>>>>NOBODY interfered. >>>> >>>>Yes you did. >>>> >>>>When I asked you the question if you were talking as CCC member or >>>>as CCC moderator you said the latter. >>>> >>>>Ed >>> >>> >>>Please. It seems definitions are very _loose_ today. Go look up "interfere" >>>and then tell me how I interefered in any of the chessmaster threads, in any >>>way or fashion. I _asked_ the poster to choose more suitable subject lines. >>>I didn't prevent him from posting _anything_. I didn't remove _anything_. >>>I didn't threaten to remove _anything_. I didn't threaten any kind of action >>>at _all_. >> >> >>>So exactly how did I interfere? >> >> >>BH wrote: >>>>>and when the threads here also have complaints about the subjects. I don't >>>>>mind the chessmaster threads, as I said during moderator elections. But I >>>>>don't like "world cup underway". A person can't hold a "world cup" event. >> >>ES: >>>>Fine with me as long as you say that as a CCC member. >> >>BH: >>>I believe that this falls under the moderator job description. >> >> >>Here for instance you admitted that your criticism to a header description >>was done in the role as moderator and not as being a CCC member. It is a >>warning to all CCC members. >> >>Do we need this? I don't think so. Which is and was my whole and only point. >> >>Ed >Why would it matter whether it was done as a member, a moderator, or by the >president of the United States? That we have discussed in length by now. Time to stop. >Did you go to school? > >College? > >If you did, how on earth did you respond when a teacher criticized your writing >style and suggested you do some things differently? That's all this was. A teacher teaches children. Ed >A >critical remark about the subject not agreeing with the body of the post. Any >writing teacher would complain if the title of a paper had _nothing_ to do with >the content. Or if the title was greatly misleading... > >I didn't even threaten to "flunk" him. :) Just asked him to be more >reasonable in choosing the subject. > >That certainly fits within the definition of "moderator". Again from my >Webster's...
This page took 0.01 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.