Author: j.e.f.kaan
Date: 17:09:06 12/24/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 20, 1997 at 07:34:55, Chris Whittington wrote: >BTW its Oxford SOFTWORKS not Oxford SYSTEMS (see above). Perhaps you >read too fast and get the wrong drift often ? :) Well not so often; but yep, I'm a quick reader *and* writer. Therefore once a boss of mine even thought I was dyslectic or so. But I didn't bother to tell him that's just a matter of general talent :) Except in chess where you can't make mistakes; at least not big ones.. > >All clear now ? Sure, reasonably clear. Maybe I'll inform at a Dutch chess shop one of these days about the CSTal system. Personally I do find attacking play interesting, as that's sometimes the way to beat a computer, well at least if it's not too strong (you know, with Qxa2 and so on, while you go after the king at g8). So other way around, a program who anticipates on such kingside attacks may also be stronger in defending against humans; pity the discontinued the Aegon tournament. good luck J.K.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.