Author: Eduard Nemeth
Date: 11:57:27 10/11/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 11, 2000 at 14:28:21, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On October 11, 2000 at 14:22:46, Eduard Nemeth wrote: > >>Nunn2-Test under F6-GUI (SP1): >> >>Gandalf 4.32f - Fritz 6(a) [D37](hash 32/32 MB) >>P600, Game=5', 10.08.2000 >> >>W=10.0 ply; 113kN/s >>B=11.1 ply; 495kN/s >>1.d4 d5 2.c4 e6 3.Sc3 Sf6 4.Sf3 Le7 5.Lf4 0-0 6.e3 c5 7.dxc5 Lxc5 8.Dc2 Sc6 9.a3 >>Da5 10.0-0-0 Beide letzter Buchzug 10...Le7 -0.09/9 8 11.cxd5 0.62/7 6 exd5 >>-0.13/10 10 12.Ld3 (Db3) 0.44/7 13 12...Le6 -0.25/10 13 13.h3 (Td2) 0.27/7 12 >>13...Tac8 (Tfc8) -0.38/9 6 14.Sg5 (Kb1) -0.25/7 12 14...h6 -0.66/9 5 15.Sxe6 >>-0.33/7 6 fxe6 -0.63/9 1 16.Kb1 -0.51/7 8 a6 (Kh8) -0.63/9 6 17.Le2 -0.33/7 6 >>Tf7 (Kh8) -0.59/9 9 18.g4 (Tc1) -0.27/7 7 18...Sa7 (b5) -0.81/9 8 19.Dd2 -0.12/7 >>9 Lxa3 (Tff8) -0.94/10 9 20.Sxd5 -0.94/8 10 Dxd5 -1.13/10 8 21.bxa3 -1.21/8 9 >>Se4 -1.06/9 5 22.Dxd5 -1.15/8 4 exd5 -0.97/9 1 23.Tde1 (The1) -1.29/8 9 >>23...Sxf2 -1.44/9 2 24.Th2 -1.36/9 7 Se4 -1.38/10 4 25.Ld3 (h4) -1.36/8 4 >>25...g5 -1.44/10 6 26.Le5 -1.29/8 4 Sf2 (Te7) -1.28/9 4 27.Lg6 -0.59/8 3 Tf3 >>(Tff8) -0.97/10 5 28.Tf1 (Lb2) -0.56/8 3 28...Sxg4 (Tcf8) -1.59/11 5 29.Txf3 >>-0.75/10 7 Sxe5 -1.78/10 1 30.Tf6 -0.81/9 7 Kg7 (Sb5) -1.78/10 3 31.Tb6 -0.96/10 >>6 Sb5 -1.78/10 2 32.Lf5 -0.96/9 3 Sxa3+ -1.63/10 6 33.Ka2 -0.72/9 3 Tc7 -1.47/11 >>7 34.Lc8 -0.67/8 3 Txc8 -1.50/10 4 35.Txb7+ -0.49/8 3 Kg6 (Kf6) -1.50/10 6 >>36.Kxa3 -0.48/8 2 Sc4+ -1.50/10 9 37.Ka2 -0.57/8 3 h5 (Te8) -1.56/10 5 38.Ta7 >>-0.44/7 2 Tc6 (Sxe3) -1.66/11 6 39.Te7 (Te2) -0.38/8 3 39...g4 -1.56/10 2 >>40.hxg4 -0.46/7 2 hxg4 -1.59/10 4 41.Kb3 -0.48/7 2 Tf6 (Kf6) -1.56/9 3 42.Kc3 >>-0.36/7 4 g3 -0.66/10 8 43.Thh7 (Th8) 0.00/8 4 43...Sd6 (Sxe3) -0.19/9 2 >>44.Teg7+ 0.19/7 4 Kf5 -0.19/7 0 45.Kd3 (Kd4) -0.27/9 5 45...Se4 (Tg6) 0.00/11 2 >>46.Th5+ 0.06/8 2 Ke6 -0.03/12 3 47.Kd4 0.01/8 2 Tf2 (Tf5) 0.03/10 1 48.Txd5 >>0.19/8 2 Td2+ 0.09/11 2 49.Kxe4 0.14/11 2 Txd5 0.06/11 0 50.Tg6+ (Txg3) 0.08/11 >>3 50...Kf7 0.00/14 2 51.Txg3 (Txa6) 0.06/11 3 51...Th5 (Tb5) -0.03/12 3 52.Kd4 >>0.01/11 3 a5 0.03/12 2 53.e4 (Tf3+) 0.00/11 3 53...Tb5 (a4) 0.00/11 1 54.e5 >>(Th3) 0.03/9 1 54...a4 -0.09/11 1 55.Tf3+ 0.03/8 1 Ke7 -0.03/13 2 56.e6 (Ta3) >>-0.15/10 3 56...Kxe6 -0.19/12 2 57.Ta3 -0.01/10 1 Tb4+ (Ta5) -0.13/13 2 58.Kc5 >>0.00/11 1 Te4 -0.09/13 2 59.Kb5 0.00/11 1 Kd5 (Td4) -0.06/12 1 60.Txa4 0.00/11 1 >>Te1 (Txa4) -0.03/12 1 61.Ta8 (Kb4) 0.00/11 1 61...Tb1+ -0.09/13 1 62.Ka6 0.00/13 >>2 Kc6 (Ta1+) -0.09/13 1 63.Tc8+ 0.00/12 1 Kd6 (Kd5) -0.09/14 1 64.Ka7 0.00/13 1 >>Ke5 (Ta1+) -0.06/12 1 65.Th8 (Tb8) 0.00/12 1 65...Kd5 (Kd4) -0.09/12 1 66.Tg8 >>(Tb8) 0.00/12 1 66...Ke4 (Ta1+) -0.06/12 1 67.Th8 (Tb8) 0.00/12 1 67...Kd4 (Kd3) >>-0.06/12 1 68.Tg8 (Td8+) 0.00/13 1 68...Tb2 (Ta1+) -0.06/12 1 69.Th8 (Tb8) >>0.00/12 1 69...Kc5 (Kc3) -0.06/12 1 70.Tg8 (Tc8+) 0.00/13 1 70...Tf2 (Tb1) >>-0.13/11 1 71.Th8 (Tc8+) 0.00/12 1 71...Tf1 (Kb4) -0.09/11 1 72.Tg8 0.00/12 1 >>Kc6 (Kb4) -0.09/11 1 73.Th8 (Tg6+) 0.00/11 0 73...Ta1+ (Kb5) -0.09/12 1 74.Kb8 >>0.00/1 0 Kd6 -0.09/12 2 75.Tg8 (Kb7) 0.00/12 1 75...Te1 (Kc5) -0.13/12 1 76.Th8 >>(Kc8) 0.00/11 0 76...Te2 (Kc5) -0.09/11 0 77.Tg8 (Kb7) 0.00/11 0 77...Tb2+ (Kc5) >>-0.13/12 1 78.Kc8 0.00/12 0 Tb1 -0.06/11 1 79.Th8 (Tg6+) 0.00/12 1 79...Tc1+ >>(Ta1) -0.13/12 1 80.Kd8 0.00/13 1 Ta1 -0.09/12 1 81.Th6+ 0.00/12 1 Ke5 (Kc5) >>-0.09/12 0 82.Ke7 (Th5+) 0.00/11 0 82...Ta7+ (Kd4) -0.09/12 0 83.Kf8 (Kd8) >>0.00/12 0 83...Td7 (Ta1) -0.09/11 0 84.Tg6 (Ke8) 0.00/10 0 84...Tc7 (Kd4) >>-0.13/12 0 85.Th6 (Ke8) 0.00/11 0 85...Kf5 (Kd4) -0.13/10 0 86.Th8 0.00/10 0 Tb7 >>(Tc8+) -0.13/11 0 87.Th5+ (Th1) 0.00/10 0 87...Ke4 -0.13/12 1 88.Ke8 (Th4+) >>0.00/11 0 88...Kd4 (Tb1) -0.09/11 0 89.Th6 (Th4+) 0.00/11 0 89...Tb1 (Tb8+) >>-0.06/11 0 90.Kf7 (Td6+) 0.00/10 0 90...Ta1 -0.06/10 0 91.Th8 (Kf6) 0.00/10 0 >>91...Ke5 (Tb1) -0.03/11 0 92.Tg8 (Te8+) 0.00/10 0 92...Tf1+ (Tb1) -0.03/11 0 >>93.Ke8 (Ke7) 0.00/11 0 93...Ke6 (Ta1) -0.09/11 0 94.Tg6+ 0.00/10 0 Kd5 -0.06/12 >>0 95.Tg8 0.00/11 0 Td1 (Ta1) -0.03/11 0 96.Ke7 (Kf7) 0.00/10 0 96...Te1+ (Kc4) >>-0.03/11 0 97.Kf8 (Kf6) 0.00/11 0 97...Ke6 (Ta1) -0.09/10 0 98.Tg6+ 0.00/11 0 >>Kd7 (Kd5) -0.13/11 0 99.Tg7+ 0.00/10 0 Kd6 (Kc6) -0.09/11 0 100.Tg8 (Tg6+) >>0.00/11 0 100...Ke5 (Kc5) -0.09/11 0 101.Th8 0.00/10 0 Kf6 (Kd4) -0.13/10 0 >>102.Th6+ 0.00/10 0 Kg5 (Ke5) -0.09/11 0 103.Ta6 (Th8) 0.00/11 0 103...Th1 (Tb1) >>-0.09/11 0 104.Te6 0.00/10 0 Kf5 (Th8+) -0.03/11 0 105.Te8 (Ke7) 0.00/10 0 >>105...Kf6 (Th8+) -0.09/11 0 106.Te6+ (Kg8) -9.38/9 0 106...Kxe6 -#6/8 0 107.Kg7 >>-#5/10 0 Tg1+ -#5/6 0 108.Kh6 -#4/9 0 Kf5 -#4/6 0 109.Kh7 -#3/9 0 Kf6 -#3/4 0 >>110.Kh8 -#2/10 0 Kf7 -#2/2 0 111.Kh7 0.00/1 0 Th1# -#1/1 0 0-1 >> >>The move 106 (??) and the valuation in move 111 (0.00) is for me inexplicable ! >>I have no answer ! >> >>Eduard > >Could be that Gandalf thought that the 50 move rule applied and made a silly >move because it assumed a draw. Mail it to the author. > >Mogens. Sorry, but my speak in english is not good ! I have this problem in CSS and in Gambit Forum (German) posted, but receive no answer. Regards, Eduard
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.