Computer Chess Club Archives


Search

Terms

Messages

Subject: Re: Kramnik's 11. Rxb7 was already a CAP record!

Author: Uri Blass

Date: 11:05:13 10/13/00

Go up one level in this thread


On October 13, 2000 at 13:54:34, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:

>On October 13, 2000 at 13:34:11, Dann Corbit wrote:
>
>>On October 13, 2000 at 08:06:14, Vincent Diepeveen wrote:
>>[snip]
>>>with cap you can never rely on its score as it' sjust a computer search
>>>score without knowing what program did the search.
>>>
>>>like using cap in najdorf knowing most used program is crafty is a bit
>>>weird of course. First of all i tactical outsearch with a dual PIII800 in
>>>a tournament game already the cap data, secondly i can't rely on it
>>>at all.
>>>
>>>So it's not usuable. i'm not surprised that CAP captures a pawn at b7
>>>at all.
>>>
>>>If you rely on cap you can never win a tournament in advance, so you can't
>>>trust it, so you can't use it. so saying it captures a pawn here i
>>>believe at once, but it doesn't change the opinion that it's a useless
>>>statement as too many important moves it plays wrong.
>>>
>>>More as a search of DIEP will reveal.
>>
>>Perhaps by minimaxing the CAP data, something better can be created.  Time will
>>tell.
>>
>>At any rate, there are many potential uses for the data.  Making a computer play
>>better is one possibility, but it may also be useful for novelty search and many
>>other notions.
>
>You're still getting the point. CAP data is a heuristic which sometimes
>is good sometimes is bad. Not reliable.
>
>In my evaluation i try to not rely on that kind of heuristics too much
>if i do i lose bigtime.
>
>So is capdata. You rely on it and lose, or you don't rely on it and don't
>lose. It cannot 'guide' you in any way.

I disagree.
If your program is out of book then the data can help you to save time in the
opening(your program is probably not going to find better move by search unless
you believe that your program is clearly better than the program that was used
for the data CAP).

I agree that trusting the data without checking it when you are in book is not a
good idea and it is better to check manually every novelty in the CAP data.

Uri



This page took 0 seconds to execute

Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700

Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.