Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:19:58 10/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 2000 at 06:00:33, Mogens Larsen wrote: >However, I do find the exchange afterwards slightly dubious from the perspective >of objective information. objective information ? must be a danish kind of thing. made for cold countries were beer is forbidden. or alcohol is expensive. objective information. that is WHAT ? if you want a LIST with all the features listed , i would advise you to go to the rebel-company and search for it. This here is a forum where people talk. objective information. people here talk subjective. they are subjects. maybe you are a machine and you prefer objective kind of talk. then search for other robots here. (guess some bean-counters come very close to robots :-)) here are human beeings. if you like it or not. > Don't you have a mailing list or something >similar where you can share your feelings, impressions and general well-being? you want us to stop posting here and talk somewhere else ? why ? don´t you like us ? :-)) i have seen you have a forum of your own. maybe you go there and tell THEM what you wish. i am sure THEY will like to hear from you :-)) >This thread, and other similar "private" discussions among Rebel beta testers >here, is borderline commercial exhortation IMO. you want to decide WHAT i talk and what not ? i would advise you to stop posting off-topic (this is a computerchess-forum) and to complain to to moderators and demand "objective" talks about objective things that is NON private. > Bombarding the unsuspecting >consumer with biased comments én masse seem to be the intention. and YOU are one of those unsuspecting consumers ??? and as a result you care about people, especially those interested in objective information written by robots from cold countries ?! >So instead of adding subjective comments, it would be preferable if you just >posted games and answered questions and comments from potential customers. people will decide HOW they answer your questions. people will decide IF they answer your questions. and people will post private and subjetcive talks about computerchess here. if you don´t like this, don´t click on the threads and don´t read them. >Starting threads with "spontaneous" comments and patting each others backs until >your hands are sore seem slightly ridiculous. Letting the members of this forum >judge for themselves without staged commentary seem fairer. it is YOU who wants to command HOW the people have to talk, what they have to post and how their contents have to be. are you the king of ccc that you order a certain way of HOW postings have to be done , "objective" and unemotional and and and ? what is next, am i allowed to post although i wear glasses ? >That just my opinion. some opinions are opinions. other opinions tell me much about the poster. take care that they don´t out you too much mogens. could be a boomerang. >Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.