Author: Mogens Larsen
Date: 05:25:03 10/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 14, 2000 at 07:49:25, Francesco Di Tolla wrote: >Ok, I guess that all of this coms from the fact they were missing your attempt >to make a feature-per-feature "scientific" comparison The original starter of this thread wanted a comparison of features of some sort, nothing particularly scientific. Some of the involved beta testers responded with inaccurate and trivial information. I tried to facilitate better information by using provokative questions and relevant comparison. Sadly, it escalated and I'm partially to blame. Thank you for posting very relevant information that should prove useful for a prospective buyer. I share your views about the flaws of Chessbase products and informational slips. The WinBoard implementation is awful and very few strong engines are actually free :o). Regards, Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.