Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 14:31:19 10/14/00
Go up one level in this thread
kramnik-kasparov is dump human-chess. the one doing less mistakes wins. or not. kramnik could have won. he did not. thats all. those kind of games do not bring us any further. its always the same with chess-players/humans. they drift away from playing accurate. kramnik began good, and lost the path. typical for humans. and what can we learn ? nothing. since this is a computerchess group, i dont see the "sensation". it was a nice game. yes. i was myself very surprised. but then kramnik ruined everything, or ? ok. whatever. you will see it. of course. but still it is typical. the icca goes eating and drinking, having the dinner, the big-party, meanwhile the chess-programs and their operators/programmers have to continue their games. thats normal. yes. normal thing. so we only have to wait until you come back from eating. ok. i am sure when it comes to give the trophy to somebody, the icca board will maybe have ended eating. i see this picture right in my mind: jaap with a hot-dog in his hand, half eating and half giving the price to the winner, meanwhile the rest of the board is chewing on some meat or pommes-frites.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.