Author: Uri Blass
Date: 04:06:19 10/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2000 at 06:28:06, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >On October 15, 2000 at 04:59:40, Harald Faber wrote: > >>On October 14, 2000 at 14:52:00, Thorsten Czub wrote: >> >>>hello jeroen ! congratulations ! >>>as we can see from the games, this new engine leads >>>to a new paradigm. christophe continues what chris began >>>5 years before. >> >>Continues??? Did Chris give his code to Christophe? >>Certainly not so don't talk of continueing, Christophe earns the honour alone. > >Christophe was the first to call himself a second Chris, hopefully for his >approach to some aspects of chess programming. > >But I think we are forgetting Marty Hirsch. Mchess is speculative, aggressive >and a lot of fun, and more balanced and succesful than CST. I would relate >Gambit more to Mchess than to CST, and not for personal reasons. > >Enrique I see from the game against nimzo that tiger had very big positional scores of more than +3 pawns(the difference between tiger's evaluation and the evaluation of most programs) Did you see similiar cases in comp-comp games when Mchess's score was +2.5 and the opponent score was +1 for itself? I am also interested to know what is mchess score after Nxc6. [D]1k1r4/p2r4/1pn5/1P2p1q1/P3Qp1p/5P1P/2R3P1/6BK w - - 0 1 If Mchess does not see a clear advantage for white than it is clear that tiger is different from mchess in the evaluation. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.