Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 04:44:21 10/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2000 at 06:28:06, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >Christophe was the first to call himself a second Chris, hopefully for his >approach to some aspects of chess programming. indeed ! harald misunderstands me. he believes i want to take glory from christophe and wants to give it to chris. IMO i do only want to point out that without people like chris, we would not talk about how TAL has done it. >But I think we are forgetting Marty Hirsch. Mchess is speculative, aggressive >and a lot of fun, and more balanced and succesful than CST. I would relate >Gambit more to Mchess than to CST, and not for personal reasons. hm. of course mchess and marty are not forgotten. but there is a thing that is different between mchess on the one side and cstal/gambit-tiger on the other side. cstal and gambit-tiger follow one main-idea, very nasty way, very penetrant, the whole game. when i remember it right mchess was not that penetrant and suffered from changing mind concerning plans. >Enrique i hope marty comes back, also we dont have to forget de koning and others. kittinger e.g. ! they all gave a stone that builds the new temple !
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.