Author: pavel
Date: 08:56:50 10/15/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 15, 2000 at 11:48:03, pavel wrote: >On October 15, 2000 at 11:38:37, pavel wrote: > >>On October 15, 2000 at 11:35:09, pavel wrote: >> >>>On October 15, 2000 at 11:19:48, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>> >>>>On October 15, 2000 at 11:16:43, pavel wrote: >>>> >>>>>On October 15, 2000 at 11:01:39, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>>> >>>>>>On October 15, 2000 at 10:59:36, pavel wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>>On October 15, 2000 at 10:43:00, Enrique Irazoqui wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>>On October 15, 2000 at 10:39:02, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>i do follow >>>>>>>>>it with gambit-tiger too. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>OK. Then I follow with X beta. Let's compare notes. Fun, no? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>Enrique >>>>>>> >>>>>>>hey enrique I am here too....... >>>>>>>just keep giving me the fen string :) >>>>>> >>>>>>NO WAY!!! >>>>>> >>>>>>I'm posting the moves somewhere else, you spy! :) >>>>> >>>>>looks like I hit the right spot :) >>>>>after all I was with chessbase too... >>>> >>>>Really? What's new in there? >>> >>>something "bad" something "dangerous" is cooking over there.........no idea ;) >>> >>>> >>>>>Pavel >>>>> >>>>>ps, wanna go online to play chess between my "X" and your "X"? >>>>>we can also play "e-mail chess" if you want, with end-less time for each prog ;) >>>> >>>>Great, but in 2 or 3 days. The towers are autoplaying like mad and with the >>>>portable I'm following the Kasparov-Kramnik. >>>> >>>>They must be very tired after yesterday's game, and Kramnik is 11 years younger. >>>>:( >>>> >>>>Enrique >>> >>>here is the game up to now >>> >>>[Event "ICS rated standard match"] >>>[Site "chess.net"] >>>[Date "2000.10.16"] >>>[Round "-"] >>>[White "GM_Kasparov"] >>>[Black "GM_Kramnik"] >>>[Result "*"] >>>[WhiteElo "2838"] >>>[BlackElo "2781"] >>>[TimeControl "7200"] >>> >>>1. c4 c5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. g3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. Bg2 Nc6 6. Nc3 g6 7. O-O Bg7 >>>8. Qa4 Nb6 9. Qb5 Nd7 10. d3 O-O 11. Be3 Nd4 12. Bxd4 cxd4 13. Ne4 Qb6 14. >>>a4 >>>* >>> >>>"mayo(NM) whispers: computers are useless in evaluating positions like these, >>> call in the comps when short term threats materialize and not until then" >>> >>>"jackal_lakcaj whispers: Qxb5 (-0.04) from CM5000" >>> >>>my buddy x-treme thinks >>> >>>depth=9 2/46 +0.17 Qc4!!! >>>nodes:79000000 NPS:16215 >>>time:8:34:06 >>> >>>Pavel >>> >>>ps, anyway to copy and paste analyzes from winboard? ;( >> >>"mayo(NM) whispers: its all irrelevant anyway, Qc4 does nothing to improve >> whites position and so wont be played with the hope of Qxb2 :)" >> >>oops......... >> >>Pavel ;) > >"Valvo(IM): a6 played" > >[Event "ICS rated standard match"] >[Site "chess.net"] >[Date "2000.10.16"] >[Round "-"] >[White "GM_Kasparov"] >[Black "GM_Kramnik"] >[Result "*"] >[WhiteElo "2838"] >[BlackElo "2781"] >[TimeControl "7200"] > >1. c4 c5 2. Nf3 Nf6 3. g3 d5 4. cxd5 Nxd5 5. Bg2 Nc6 6. Nc3 g6 7. O-O Bg7 >8. Qa4 Nb6 9. Qb5 Nd7 10. d3 O-O 11. Be3 Nd4 12. Bxd4 cxd4 13. Ne4 Qb6 14. >a4 a6 >* > >"mayo(NM) whispers: I can see the e4 N taking a little trip, e4-d2-c4-b6 home > sweet home" > > > >"jackal_lakcaj whispers: Qc4 (0.07) from CM5000" > > >"DragonSlayr(NM): hehe take b2!" > >"25watts whispers: kasparov has been drinking too much vodka >chess% >25watts whispers: are players allowed to smoke at table?" > >x-treme thinks, +0.17 Qc4 !!! > >Pavel Stein1tz whispers: new move! Qxb6 mayo(NM) whispers: now Kramnik gets to suffer for the rest of the game Ok i have to go now :( bye pavel
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.