Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:24:23 10/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2000 at 13:10:28, Chessfun wrote: >On October 16, 2000 at 12:55:56, Robert Hyatt wrote: > >>On October 16, 2000 at 11:30:44, Chessfun wrote: >> >>>On October 16, 2000 at 10:49:39, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>>> >>>>Show me the solid evidence that shows it works. I played a zillion games vs >>>>CSTal (on ICC) using equal hardware. (P6/200 single cpu at the time). It >>>>didn't work then. 2 of every 3 games ended in an endgame. and 9 of every 10 >>>>of those ended in a loss for the speculative program. >>> >>> >>>Now this zillion I have to see. >>> >>>Sarah. >> >> >>I believe most understand the concept that "zillion" -> "large number". And >>I mean _large_ number. Large -> 20 per day for several months. Many operated >>directly by Chris. > > >Ok now I get it. >"Zillion" = Large Number = 20 per day for several? months. >Hundreds = 87 or Two Hundred. > >Sarah. I do not remmeber that Bob claimed that hundreds=87. My understanding of the english language say that hundreds can be also two hundreds and the number of hundreds is not clear when it is at least 2. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.