Author: Uri Blass
Date: 10:51:47 10/16/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2000 at 13:18:51, Uri Blass wrote: >On October 16, 2000 at 07:43:07, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>On October 16, 2000 at 07:39:19, Uri Blass wrote: >>>Rc6 is also losing material and it is not clear that the positional advantage is >>>bigger than the material loss. >>> >>>A lot of humans player do not play in this style. >>> >>>There are a lot of humans players who never sacrifice unless they see some >>>tactics to prove that the sacrifice is correct. >>> >>>They can learn to play in a different way but it does not change the fact that >>>the move is not trivial for a lot of humans. >>> >>>Uri >> >>defend against Rc6, >>what do you play with black ? > >I decided to analyze the position after Rc6 Nxc6 bxc6 because not accepting the >sacrifice is clearly not winning for black and I look for a win for black and >not for a draw. > >My Junior5.9 at slow time control wants to play with black after the moves >44...Rc7(-0.75/21 34:16) 45.a5(19:34) bxa5(-0.48/21 2:06:32) 46.Qe2(22:01) >Kh8(-0.94/18 22:44) It is a mistake and I meant Ka8 > >Junior expected 46.Qa4 and not 46.Qe2. > >I need to check the position after 46.Qe2 Kh8 because I do not want to fall in a >trap. > >Junior5.9 started iteration 21(the score at iteration 18 is 0.92 pawns for black >and the suggested move is 47.Rc5). > >Uri The evaluation now is 0.91 at depth 21 and the move after an hour is the same 47.Rc5 Junior5.9 starts now depth 23. I do not see a clear change in the evaluation so I guess that 46...Ka8 is not losing. Uri
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.