Author: Ernst Walet
Date: 22:58:03 12/26/97
Go up one level in this thread
On December 26, 1997 at 21:11:52, Thorsten Czub wrote: >>>The *effect* is counter-revolutionary, while the *intent* was greater >>>knowledge. >>> >>>You guys argue to shoot Sandro Nechi. Instead you should be applauding >>>him. >> >>Depends of ones evaluation relative "the Stalin dictum"? >> >>>Chris Whittington >> >> >>kim > >Brilliant group here. >Some are interested in relating anything to Hitler and Nazi, >others quote Stalin's dictum... > >Why for heavens sake is it important to use these guys always and always >as a vehicle to show big contrast. Isn't it possible to post a point of >view withot quoting the biggest criminals of the universe ? > >And all this in a computer-chess-group ? And this nearly one day after >christmas. Heavens. This is really shocking ! >But ok - if you really need it...(maybe to get your kicks) :-( > >Could you please do this in email ? >I am not interested in what criminals have said or how they behaved or >whatever. I can live without quoting them and I can live without >misusing their words in almost any sentence. > >The world has some nice point of views. Why is there a need to see >anything from the weakest point of view ?! :-( >Thanks. Couldn't have said it better! Ernst.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.