Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 02:57:00 10/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 16, 2000 at 21:21:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: >In the case of the cstal games, several here tuned in each nite to watch them. >Most were played by "lonnie" but maybe 100 or so by cstal accounts (all games >were not saved as at times, cstal's rating was too low to save the games.) >Most got tired of watching them, as the dreaded "wild attacks" simply never >happened... or if they did, in maybe one of 20 games... Nonsense IMO. CSTal plays not that weak. Depends which machine you use and which time control. it was never designed for blitz-games. for getting those kind of RESULTS on 40/120 you need more than luck: Chess Tal 2.03 - Crafty 17.10 ---------------- 4 zu 3 und 3 x Remis = 5.5 zu 4.5 Chess Tal 2.03 - Fritz 6.0a -------------------- 4 zu 5 und 1 x Remis = 4.5 zu 5.5 Chess Tal 2.03 - Fritz 5.32 -------------------- 2 zu 3 und 5 x Remis = 4.5 zu 5.5 Chess Tal 2.03 - Fritz 5.00 -------------------- 2 zu 3 und 5 x Remis = 4.5 zu 5.5 Chess Tal 2.03 - Junior 6.0 -------------------- 2 zu 3 und 5 x Remis = 4.5 zu 5.5 Chess Tal 2.03 - Nimzo 7.32 ------------------ 3 zu 5 und 2 x Remis = 4.0 zu 6.0 Chess Tal 2.03 - Nimzo`99 -------------------- 2 zu 3 und 5 x Remis = 4.5 zu 5.5 5.5-4.5 against crafty 4.5-5.5 against fritz6a 4.5-5.5 against junior is this showing that CSTAL is to weak to save the games. it seems you talk about blitz games you have seen, with strange machines. seems your data is based on fast time control and slow machines. this way i can make ANY program into a loser.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.