Author: Thorsten Czub
Date: 07:03:30 10/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2000 at 07:16:33, Mogens Larsen wrote: >On October 17, 2000 at 05:57:00, Thorsten Czub wrote: > >>it seems you talk about blitz games you have seen, with strange machines. >>seems your data is based on fast time control and slow machines. >>this way i can make ANY program into a loser. > >You use even less data to make conclusions about Gambit Tiger, i have played out - myself - not counted all the other 24 beta-testers over 150 games (about gambit-tiger) so far. these are all 60/60 and 40/120 or 60/120. how can you say that i do have LESS Data ?? i am watching tiger games since 1998 after paris championship. more than you can imagine. so you're doing >exactly the same and even worse. The difference is that you can make every >program a winner and jump to conlusions at the speed of light. I hope you're >wearing heavy shoes, all this hot air inside might make you fly away. pah - words - you critic is beyond any data. i do not comment further because there is nothing substantial in your critics. >Mogens.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.