Author: Robert Hyatt
Date: 07:22:10 10/17/00
Go up one level in this thread
On October 17, 2000 at 05:57:00, Thorsten Czub wrote: >On October 16, 2000 at 21:21:47, Robert Hyatt wrote: >>In the case of the cstal games, several here tuned in each nite to watch them. >>Most were played by "lonnie" but maybe 100 or so by cstal accounts (all games >>were not saved as at times, cstal's rating was too low to save the games.) >>Most got tired of watching them, as the dreaded "wild attacks" simply never >>happened... or if they did, in maybe one of 20 games... > >Nonsense IMO. >CSTal plays not that weak. Depends which machine you use and >which time control. it was never designed for blitz-games. > >for getting those kind of RESULTS on 40/120 you need more than luck: > >Chess Tal 2.03 - Crafty 17.10 ---------------- 4 zu 3 und 3 x Remis = 5.5 zu 4.5 >Chess Tal 2.03 - Fritz 6.0a -------------------- 4 zu 5 und 1 x Remis = 4.5 zu >5.5 >Chess Tal 2.03 - Fritz 5.32 -------------------- 2 zu 3 und 5 x Remis = 4.5 zu >5.5 >Chess Tal 2.03 - Fritz 5.00 -------------------- 2 zu 3 und 5 x Remis = 4.5 zu >5.5 >Chess Tal 2.03 - Junior 6.0 -------------------- 2 zu 3 und 5 x Remis = 4.5 zu >5.5 >Chess Tal 2.03 - Nimzo 7.32 ------------------ 3 zu 5 und 2 x Remis = 4.0 zu 6.0 >Chess Tal 2.03 - Nimzo`99 -------------------- 2 zu 3 und 5 x Remis = 4.5 zu 5.5 > >5.5-4.5 against crafty >4.5-5.5 against fritz6a >4.5-5.5 against junior > >is this showing that CSTAL is to weak to save the games. > >it seems you talk about blitz games you have seen, with strange machines. >seems your data is based on fast time control and slow machines. >this way i can make ANY program into a loser. The games we played were played at the time control Chris chose, as he started the games. Or Lonnie. _I_ know what it takes to get the results posted above. I won't say to protect the guilty, however.
This page took 0 seconds to execute
Last modified: Thu, 15 Apr 21 08:11:13 -0700
Current Computer Chess Club Forums at Talkchess. This site by Sean Mintz.